Lacy Mary, Noronha Leonard, Leyva Yuridia, Pierce John Rush
From the Department of Internal Medicine, University New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque.
South Med J. 2019 Feb;112(2):70-75. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000932.
At our institution, learner communication skills during an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) are measured by standardized patients (SPs) using the New Mexico Clinical Communication Scale (NM-CCS). Faculty physicians also conduct a direct observation of a clinical encounter (DOCE) to observe students' interactions with real hospitalized patients. The objective of this study was to determine whether students have similar communication skills scores with real patients as compared with SPs.
The NM-CCS was modified to fit a hospital encounter (mNM-CCS). Student NM-CCS scores for an OSCE were compared with their matched mNM-CCS scores obtained during their DOCE.
Matched scores were compared for 83 students. The mean total percentage scores on the DOCE and OSCE were both 60%. There was no correlation between individual student communication scores. The difference between mean total scores mNM-CCS scores for the faculty preceptors was not statistically significant ( = 0.1985).
We found no correlation between student communication scores measured by faculty during the DOCE compared with communication skills measured by SPs during an OSCE. The discordant results of some students on the OSCE compared with the DOCE suggests that the OSCE may not identify students who may benefit from additional communication skills training.
在我们机构,客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)期间学习者的沟通技能由标准化病人(SP)使用新墨西哥临床沟通量表(NM-CCS)进行评估。教师医师也会进行临床接触直接观察(DOCE),以观察学生与实际住院患者的互动情况。本研究的目的是确定与标准化病人相比,学生与真实患者的沟通技能得分是否相似。
对NM-CCS进行修改以适用于医院诊疗(mNM-CCS)。将学生在OSCE中的NM-CCS得分与其在DOCE期间获得的匹配mNM-CCS得分进行比较。
对83名学生的匹配得分进行了比较。DOCE和OSCE的平均总百分比得分均为60%。学生个体沟通得分之间无相关性。教师带教人员的mNM-CCS平均总分之间的差异无统计学意义( = 0.1985)。
我们发现教师在DOCE期间测量的学生沟通得分与标准化病人在OSCE期间测量的沟通技能之间无相关性。一些学生在OSCE与DOCE上的不一致结果表明,OSCE可能无法识别那些可能从额外沟通技能培训中受益的学生。