National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):1161-1164. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.96.
This commentary discusses the interesting and surprising findings by Hagen and colleagues, focusing on the role of the public health coordinator as a Health in All Policies (HiAP) tool. The original article finds a negative association between the employment of public health coordinators in Norwegian municipalities and consideration of a fair distribution of social and economic resources between social groups in local policymaking and planning. The commentary contemplates whether this surprising negative association should be interpreted as a failure of implementation, as suggested by the authors, or whether it might be the theory of change that has failed. On this basis, it is suggested that the very notion of HiAP could be flawed by the assumption that health should function as an overarching aim across government sectors. Potentially, the social determinants of health (SDH) might be more efficiently addressed by means of sectoral action by the corresponding sectors, emphasizing equity rather than health.
本评论讨论了 Hagen 及其同事的有趣和令人惊讶的发现,重点关注公共卫生协调员作为健康全政策(HiAP)工具的作用。原文发现,挪威市雇佣公共卫生协调员与在地方决策和规划中考虑社会群体之间公平分配社会和经济资源之间呈负相关。评论思考了这种令人惊讶的负相关关系是否应该被解释为作者所建议的实施失败,或者它是否可能是改变理论的失败。在此基础上,有人认为,HiAP 的概念本身可能存在缺陷,因为它假设卫生应该作为政府各部门的总体目标。通过相应部门的部门行动,更有效地解决健康的社会决定因素(SDH),强调公平而不是健康。