Suppr超能文献

手术复位固定与 halo-vest 固定治疗不稳定寰椎骨折的影像学和临床结果比较。

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgical reduction with fixation or halo-vest immobilization for treating unstable atlas fractures.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Dongil-ro 1342, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01757, South Korea.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Apr;161(4):685-693. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03824-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unstable atlas fractures with concomitant transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury may be conservatively managed by halo-vest immobilization (HVI) or surgically treated by various fixation techniques. Many surgeons prefer surgical management due to complications, nonunion, and further dislocations with HVI. There are no comparative studies on surgical and nonsurgical management of unstable atlas fractures. We retrospectively assessed the radiological and clinical outcomes of surgical reduction with fixation vs. non-operative treatments for unstable atlas fractures with TAL rupture.

METHODS

We analyzed records of 24 patients (15 men, 9 women; mean age, 48.3 years) with at least 1 year of follow-up. They underwent HVI or surgical reduction with fixation for unstable atlas fracture combined with TAL injury. Clinical outcomes, including neck visual analog scale and neck disability index (NDI), and radiological measurements, including degree of fracture displacement, atlantodental interval (ADI), range of motion (ROM), cervical alignment, fusion rate, and time-to-fusion, were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 24 patients, 13 were treated by surgical reduction with fixation (C1 lateral mass screw-C2 pedicle screw with a cross-link) and 11 by HVI. A significant reduction in lateral displacement of fractured lateral masses was identified in surgical reduction with fixation (3.21 ± 1.21 mm) compared with HVI (0.97 ± 2.69 mm). The mean reduction in ADI was 1.47 ± 1.08 mm with surgical fixation and 0.66 ± 1.02 mm with HVI. The bony rate and time-to-fusion were 100% and 14.91 ± 3.9 weeks with surgical reduction, and 72.7% and 22.31 ± 10.85 weeks with HVI. The postoperative neck pain relief and NDI after surgical fixation were higher than those after HVI.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HVI, surgical reduction with fixation reduces fractured lateral mass displacements, increases fusion rate, and reduces time-to-fusion while maintaining cervical curvature and improving neck pain and daily activities.

摘要

背景

伴有寰枢横韧带(TAL)损伤的不稳定性寰椎骨折可通过 halo-vest 固定(HVI)进行保守治疗,也可通过各种固定技术进行手术治疗。由于 HVI 存在并发症、不愈合和进一步脱位的风险,许多外科医生更倾向于手术治疗。目前尚无关于不稳定寰椎骨折手术和非手术治疗的比较研究。我们回顾性评估了手术复位固定与非手术治疗伴 TAL 破裂的不稳定寰椎骨折的影像学和临床结果。

方法

我们分析了 24 例(15 名男性,9 名女性;平均年龄 48.3 岁)至少随访 1 年的患者记录。他们因不稳定寰椎骨折合并 TAL 损伤而行 HVI 或手术复位固定。评估了临床结果,包括颈部视觉模拟量表和颈部残疾指数(NDI),以及影像学测量结果,包括骨折移位程度、寰齿间距(ADI)、活动范围(ROM)、颈椎排列、融合率和融合时间。

结果

24 例患者中,13 例采用手术复位固定(C1 侧块螺钉-C2 椎弓根螺钉加交叉固定),11 例采用 HVI。与 HVI 相比,手术复位固定组寰椎侧块骨折的侧向移位明显减少(3.21±1.21mm)。ADI 的平均减少量为 1.47±1.08mm,采用手术固定,0.66±1.02mm,采用 HVI。手术复位固定组的骨性融合率和融合时间分别为 100%和 14.91±3.9 周,HVI 组分别为 72.7%和 22.31±10.85 周。手术后,采用手术固定的患者颈部疼痛缓解和 NDI 高于采用 HVI 的患者。

结论

与 HVI 相比,手术复位固定可减少寰椎侧块骨折的移位,提高融合率,缩短融合时间,同时保持颈椎曲度,改善颈部疼痛和日常活动。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验