• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命终末期医疗费用报销中的社会经济不平等:一项全国性研究。

Socioeconomic inequality in drug reimbursement during end-of-life care: a nationwide study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Palliative Care Team, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 May;73(5):435-442. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211580. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2018-211580
PMID:30711916
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Denmark, patients who are terminally ill have the right to drug reimbursement due to terminal illness (DRTI). DRTI, a proxy marker of planned end-of-life care, is intended to be equally accessible regardless of socioeconomic position. This study examined social and socioeconomic differences in DRTI among Danish patients who are terminally ill.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study based on individual-level nationwide data included all patients dying from cancer, dementia, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes or stroke in 2006-2015 (n=307 188). We analysed associations between social and socioeconomic position (education, income, cohabiting status, migrant status and employment) and DRTI. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-linear models adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity, cause of death and residence.

RESULTS

Overall, 27.9% of patients received DRTI (n=85 616). A substantial difference in likelihood of receiving DRTI was observed among patients with a social and socioeconomic profile associated with the highest versus lowest probability of DRTI (adjusted PR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.75). The probability of DRTI was higher among patients with high income compared with low income (adjusted PR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.26). Also, living with a partner and being immigrant or descendant of such were associated with higher probability of DRTI compared with living alone and of Danish origin, whereas employment was associated with lower probability of DRTI compared with retirement.

CONCLUSION

Social and socioeconomic position was associated with the likelihood of receiving DRTI, which indicates that planned end-of-life care is not equally accessible in Denmark.

摘要

背景

在丹麦,绝症患者有权获得因绝症而给予的药物补偿(DRTI)。DRTI 是临终关怀计划的替代指标,旨在让所有绝症患者都能平等地获得这种补偿,无论其社会经济地位如何。本研究旨在调查丹麦绝症患者接受 DRTI 的社会和社会经济差异。

方法

这是一项基于个体层面全国性数据的横断面研究,纳入了 2006 年至 2015 年期间死于癌症、痴呆、缺血性心脏病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、慢性肝病、充血性心力衰竭、糖尿病或中风的所有患者(n=307188)。我们分析了社会和社会经济地位(教育程度、收入、同居状况、移民身份和就业状况)与 DRTI 之间的关联。使用调整了年龄、性别、合并症、死因和居住地的对数线性模型来估计患病率比(PR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

总体而言,27.9%的患者接受了 DRTI(n=85616)。在与 DRTI 发生可能性最高和最低相关的社会和社会经济特征的患者中,接受 DRTI 的可能性存在显著差异(调整后 PR 1.44,95%CI 1.18 至 1.75)。与低收入相比,高收入患者接受 DRTI 的可能性更高(调整后 PR 1.22,95%CI 1.17 至 1.26)。此外,与独居和丹麦血统相比,与伴侣同住和移民或移民后代更有可能接受 DRTI,而与退休相比,就业与接受 DRTI 的可能性较低相关。

结论

社会和社会经济地位与接受 DRTI 的可能性相关,这表明丹麦的临终关怀计划并非平等可得。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic inequality in drug reimbursement during end-of-life care: a nationwide study.生命终末期医疗费用报销中的社会经济不平等:一项全国性研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 May;73(5):435-442. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211580. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
2
Geographical variation in palliative cancer care in a tax-based healthcare system: drug reimbursement in Denmark.基于税收的医疗体系中癌症姑息治疗的地域差异:丹麦的药物报销。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Apr 1;30(2):223-229. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz211.
3
Socioeconomic position and place of death of cancer patients.癌症患者的社会经济地位与死亡地点
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012 Jun;2(2):133-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000116. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
4
Access to outreach specialist palliative care teams among cancer patients in Denmark.丹麦癌症患者获得外展专科姑息治疗团队的途径。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Aug;16(8):951-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0265. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
5
Socioeconomic position and survival after lung cancer: Influence of stage, treatment and comorbidity among Danish patients with lung cancer diagnosed in 2004-2010.社会经济地位与肺癌患者生存率:2004 - 2010年丹麦肺癌确诊患者中分期、治疗及合并症的影响
Acta Oncol. 2015 May;54(5):797-804. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.1001037. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
6
Inequality in place-of-death among children: a Danish nationwide study.儿童死亡地点的不平等:一项丹麦全国性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Feb;181(2):609-617. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04250-5. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
7
Socioeconomic inequality in clinical outcome among hip fracture patients: a nationwide cohort study.髋部骨折患者临床结局的社会经济不平等:一项全国性队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Apr;28(4):1233-1243. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3853-7. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
8
Intensive care at the end of life in patients dying due to non-cancer chronic diseases versus cancer: a nationwide study in Denmark.非癌症慢性疾病患者与癌症患者临终时的重症监护:丹麦的一项全国性研究
Crit Care. 2015 Nov 24;19:413. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1124-1.
9
Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in oral health among 15-year-old Danish adolescents during 1995-2013: A nationwide, register-based, repeated cross-sectional study.1995年至2013年丹麦15岁青少年口腔健康的社会经济不平等趋势:一项基于全国登记数据的重复横断面研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;45(5):458-468. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12310. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Hospitalisation at the end of life among cancer and non-cancer patients in Denmark: a nationwide register-based cohort study.丹麦癌症和非癌症患者生命末期的住院情况:一项基于全国登记的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e033493. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033493.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative care consultation in the last week of life and associated factors: a cross-sectional general population study.生命最后一周的姑息治疗咨询及相关因素:一项横断面普通人群研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Nov 8;18:26323524241293818. doi: 10.1177/26323524241293818. eCollection 2024.
2
Healthcare Costs at the End of Life for Patients with Non-cancer Diseases and Cancer in Denmark.丹麦非癌症疾病和癌症患者临终时的医疗费用。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Sep;7(5):751-764. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00430-1. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
3
The end of life experiences of people living with socio-economic deprivation in the developed world: an integrative review.
发达国家中社会经济贫困人群的临终经历:综合回顾。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 5;21(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01080-6.
4
Socioeconomic Disparity Trends in End-of-Life Care for Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients: Are We Closing the Gap?癌症和非癌症患者临终关怀中的社会经济差异趋势:我们正在缩小差距吗?
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 May 4;14:653-664. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S362170. eCollection 2022.
5
Poor physical and mental health predicts prolonged grief disorder: A prospective, population-based cohort study on caregivers of patients at the end of life.身心健康状况不佳预示着持续性悲伤障碍:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为临终患者的照料者。
Palliat Med. 2020 Dec;34(10):1416-1424. doi: 10.1177/0269216320948007. Epub 2020 Aug 23.