a Postgraduate Program, School of Dentistry , Fluminense Federal University , Nova Friburgo , RJ , Brazil.
b Postgraduate Program, School of Dentistry , Fluminense Federal University , Niterói , RJ , Brazil.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Jul;77(5):347-358. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1570331. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
To evaluate if the kinematics of engine-driven instruments affect the root canal shape.
The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42017077043). A broad search was performed for articles published before 26 September 2018 in the electronic databases: pubmed, scopus, web of science and Lilacs using MeSH and free terms. Only in vitro studies with human teeth that evaluated root canal shape by volume, surface area and unprepared surface area using reciprocating and rotary system assessed by micro-computed tomography were included. A modified checklist for randomized controlled trials from the Joanna Briggs Institute was used to assess the risk of bias.
Twenty-one articles were selected. According to quality assessment, all studies were considered 'moderate methodological quality'. Eighteen articles analysed volume increase, only four studies showed statistically significant difference, three indicating that the reciprocating movement obtained a greater increase in volume than the rotary system and one rotary system obtained a greater increase. Twelve studies analysed surface area, only three studies showed statistically significant difference, two presented a reciprocating system revealing greater amount of surface area and one showed a rotary system obtained a greater amount of surface area. Ten articles evaluated unprepared surface area, two studies that analysed total length, one study presented that the rotary system revealed lower unprepared surface area while another study showed reciprocating with less unprepared area. One study analysed middle and apical third, and observed that the rotary system presented lower unprepared surface area in the middle third.
Both the rotary and reciprocating kinematics produce changes in volume and surface area and leave unprepared areas in the root canal, however reciprocating system showed greater increase of volume and surface area, while the rotary system maintains less unprepared surface area.
评估引擎驱动器械的运动学是否会影响根管形态。
本系统评价已在 PROSPERO(CRD42017077043)中注册。在 2018 年 9 月 26 日之前,在电子数据库 pubmed、scopus、web of science 和 Lilacs 中使用 MeSH 和自由词进行了广泛搜索,以查找已发表的文章。仅纳入了使用往复和旋转系统通过体视学评估根管形态的容积、表面积和未预备表面积的体外研究。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的改良随机对照试验清单评估偏倚风险。
共选择了 21 篇文章。根据质量评估,所有研究均被认为具有“中等方法学质量”。18 篇文章分析了容积增加,只有 4 项研究显示出统计学上的显著差异,其中 3 项表明往复运动比旋转系统获得更大的容积增加,1 项旋转系统获得更大的容积增加。12 篇文章分析了表面积,只有 3 项研究显示出统计学上的显著差异,其中 2 项表明往复系统显示出更大的表面积,1 项表明旋转系统获得更大的表面积。10 篇文章评估了未预备表面积,其中 2 项研究分析了总长度,1 项研究表明旋转系统在中三分之一处显示出较低的未预备表面积,而另一项研究表明往复运动具有较小的未预备面积。1 项研究分析了中三分之一和根尖三分之一,观察到旋转系统在中三分之一处显示出较低的未预备表面积。
往复和旋转运动学都会导致容积和表面积的变化,并在根管中留下未预备区域,但往复系统显示出更大的容积和表面积增加,而旋转系统保持较少的未预备表面积。