Falcão Natália Pereira da Silva, Marceliano-Alves Marilia Fagury, Tavares Sandro Junio Oliveira, Amoroso-Silva Pablo, Neves Aline de Almeida, Bastos Luan Ferreira, Lopes Ricardo Tadeu, Dantas Wania Christina Figueiredo, Galhardi Michelle Paiva Weydt, Marceliano Eduardo Fagury Videira, Gomes Cinthya Cristina
Department of Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo (PPGO-ISNF), Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Nova Friburgo, RJ, Brazil.
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Iguaçu University (UNIG), Nova Iguaçu, RJ, Brazil.
Eur J Dent. 2024 May;18(2):544-550. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772568. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
This study compared the shaping ability of TRUShape and XP-endo Shaper systems on C-shaped root canals replicas using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT).
Thirty three-dimensional replicas based on a mandibular second molar classified as C1 type I C-shaped canal were randomly divided into two groups ( = 15): TRUShape (G.TRU) and XP-endo Shaper (G.XP) and instrumented with each system according to the manufacturer's instructions. Changes in volume and surface and the unprepared area of the root canal were measured by scanning on micro-CT before and after instrumentation.
The unprepared areas were 39% in the G.TRU and 43% in the G.XP group with no significant difference between them ( > 0.05), but both the tested systems left a high percentage of unprepared root canal walls of C-shaped root canals.
TRUShape and XP-endo Shaper showed a high rate of unprepared areas with similar results after C-shaped root canals replicas for root canal preparation.
本研究使用微型计算机断层扫描(显微CT)比较TRUShape和XP-endo Shaper系统对C形根管模型的根管预备能力。
将33个基于下颌第二磨牙C1型I类C形根管的三维模型随机分为两组(每组 = 15个):TRUShape组(G.TRU)和XP-endo Shaper组(G.XP),并根据制造商的说明用每个系统进行根管预备。在预备前后通过显微CT扫描测量根管的体积、表面积和未预备区域的变化。
G.TRU组的未预备区域为39%,G.XP组为43%,两组之间无显著差异(P > 0.05),但两个测试系统在C形根管的未预备根管壁上均留下了较高比例。
在对C形根管模型进行根管预备后,TRUShape和XP-endo Shaper显示出较高比例的未预备区域,结果相似。