• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

65岁以下患者初次翻修全肩关节置换术的疗效

Outcomes of Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 65 Years Old.

作者信息

Matthews Christopher J, Wright Thomas W, Farmer Kevin W, Struk Aimee M, Vasilopoulos Terrie, King Joseph J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Feb;44(2):104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.11.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.11.008
PMID:30712650
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compare clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients 65 years old or younger with a matched control group of patients 70 years old or older.

METHODS

Forty-three patients (17 men and 26 women) 65 years old or younger were retrospectively identified. The mean age was 60 years and average follow-up was 4.0 years. The most common surgical indication was rotator cuff arthropathy. Patients were sex- and diagnosis-matched to control patients 70 years old or older with a mean follow-up of 4.1 years. Active range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes in the 2 groups were evaluated before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients 65 years old or younger had significantly lower preoperative functional scores; preoperative ROM, however, was similar in the 2 groups. Both groups significantly improved in postoperative ROM and functional scores (with no difference in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI]-130, Simple Shoulder Test [SST], University of California-Los Angeles [UCLA], and Constant scores); however, the younger cohort had lower functional scores; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were significantly lower after surgery. The change in ROM and outcome measures before to after surgery was similar between groups. Similar complications and notching rates were seen between the groups at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

An RTSA in patients 65 years old or younger improves ROM comparably with patients 70 years old or older. Younger patients have lower functional scores before and after surgery. An RTSA in younger patients improves pain and function but is associated with worse perceived outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

摘要

目的

我们比较65岁及以下患者行初次翻修全肩关节置换术(RTSA)与70岁及以上匹配对照组患者的临床结果。

方法

回顾性纳入43例65岁及以下患者(17例男性和26例女性)。平均年龄为60岁,平均随访时间为4.0年。最常见的手术指征是肩袖关节病。将患者按性别和诊断与70岁及以上的对照患者进行匹配,平均随访时间为4.1年。评估两组患者手术前后的主动活动范围(ROM)和功能结果。

结果

65岁及以下患者术前功能评分显著较低;然而,两组术前的ROM相似。两组术后的ROM和功能评分均显著改善(肩痛与功能障碍指数[SPADI]-130、简易肩关节测试[SST]、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校[UCLA]和常数评分无差异);然而,较年轻队列的功能评分较低;美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)和12项简短健康调查(SF-12)在术后显著较低。两组手术前后ROM和结果指标的变化相似。在最终随访时,两组的并发症和开槽率相似。

结论

65岁及以下患者行RTSA与70岁及以上患者相比,ROM改善程度相当。较年轻患者手术前后的功能评分较低。较年轻患者行RTSA可改善疼痛和功能,但与较差的感知结果相关。

研究类型和证据水平

治疗性III级。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 65 Years Old.65岁以下患者初次翻修全肩关节置换术的疗效
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Feb;44(2):104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.11.008.
2
Are Age and Patient Gender Associated With Different Rates and Magnitudes of Clinical Improvement After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?年龄和患者性别与反肩置换术后临床改善的速度和幅度是否相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jun;476(6):1264-1273. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000270.
3
Revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 65 years old and younger: outcome comparison with older patients.65岁及以下患者的翻修性反式全肩关节置换术:与老年患者的疗效比较
JSES Int. 2021 Dec 23;6(2):229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.012. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Effects of obesity on clinical and functional outcomes following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.肥胖对解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术后临床和功能结果的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jan;31(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
5
Two-year clinical outcomes and complication rates in anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty implanted with Exactech GPS intraoperative navigation.采用Exactech GPS术中导航植入的解剖型和反肩关节置换术的两年临床疗效及并发症发生率
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Dec;32(12):2519-2532. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.021. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
Preoperative factors associated with loss of range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.与反式肩关节置换术后活动范围丧失相关的术前因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):e621-e628. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in wheelchair-dependent patients.依赖轮椅患者的反式全肩关节置换术。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.006. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Clinical and radiographic outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 80 years of age and older.80 岁及以上患者行反式全肩关节置换术后的临床和影像学结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):1137-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.044. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
9
Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state.量化首次翻修反式全肩关节置换术后的成功:最小临床重要差异、实质性临床获益和患者可接受的症状状态。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Oct;32(10):e516-e527. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.032. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
Minimum 2-year clinical outcomes after superior capsule reconstruction compared with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 70 years.与反式全肩关节置换术相比,对于 70 岁以下的不可修复性肩袖后上方撕裂患者,行上方囊重建术后的最低 2 年临床结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Dec;29(12):2514-2522. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Greater Tuberosity Resurfacing for Compensated Cuff Arthropathy.代偿性肩袖关节病大结节表面重建后的功能结果与并发症
Iowa Orthop J. 2025;45(1):145-152.
2
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes in elderly patients.老年患者全肩关节置换翻修术的疗效
JSES Int. 2025 Feb 6;9(3):815-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.01.006. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Revision rates and progression to shoulder arthroplasty after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears.巨大肩袖撕裂关节镜修复术后的翻修率及进展至肩关节置换术的情况。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jun;33(6):2255-2268. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12651. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
4
[Influencing factors on effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty].[影响反式全肩关节置换术疗效的因素]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 15;38(2):211-217. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202310088.
5
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients Younger Than 60 Years Old Exhibit Lower Clinically Significant Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Scores Compared to Older Patients.与老年患者相比,60岁以下的反肩关节置换术患者在具有临床意义的单项评估数值评定(SANE)评分方面较低。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 4;15(10):e46492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46492. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Outcomes of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients over the age of 70: a systematic review.70岁以上患者解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术的疗效:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Mar 4;3(2):181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.02.003. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Younger Patients: A Comparable Analysis of Patients Older and Younger Than 65 Years.反式全肩关节置换术治疗年轻患者:65 岁以上和 65 岁以下患者的对比分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Jun 20;7(6). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00264. eCollection 2023 Jun 1.
8
Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty in the COVID-19 era: 90-day complications and risk factors.COVID-19 时代的门诊肩关节置换术:90 天内的并发症和危险因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 May;32(5):1043-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.034. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
9
Survivorship of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty According to Indication, Age and Gender.根据适应症、年龄和性别分析反肩关节置换术的生存率
J Clin Med. 2022 May 10;11(10):2677. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102677.
10
Revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 65 years old and younger: outcome comparison with older patients.65岁及以下患者的翻修性反式全肩关节置换术:与老年患者的疗效比较
JSES Int. 2021 Dec 23;6(2):229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.012. eCollection 2022 Mar.