Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):747-757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31940-8. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
Fetal structural anomalies, which are detected by ultrasonography, have a range of genetic causes, including chromosomal aneuploidy, copy number variations (CNVs; which are detectable by chromosomal microarrays), and pathogenic sequence variants in developmental genes. Testing for aneuploidy and CNVs is routine during the investigation of fetal structural anomalies, but there is little information on the clinical usefulness of genome-wide next-generation sequencing in the prenatal setting. We therefore aimed to evaluate the proportion of fetuses with structural abnormalities that had identifiable variants in genes associated with developmental disorders when assessed with whole-exome sequencing (WES).
In this prospective cohort study, two groups in Birmingham and London recruited patients from 34 fetal medicine units in England and Scotland. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to evaluate the presence of genetic variants in developmental disorder genes (diagnostic genetic variants) in a cohort of fetuses with structural anomalies and samples from their parents, after exclusion of aneuploidy and large CNVs. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were undergoing invasive testing for identified nuchal translucency or structural anomalies in their fetus, as detected by ultrasound after 11 weeks of gestation. The partners of these women also had to consent to participate. Sequencing results were interpreted with a targeted virtual gene panel for developmental disorders that comprised 1628 genes. Genetic results related to fetal structural anomaly phenotypes were then validated and reported postnatally. The primary endpoint, which was assessed in all fetuses, was the detection of diagnostic genetic variants considered to have caused the fetal developmental anomaly.
The cohort was recruited between Oct 22, 2014, and June 29, 2017, and clinical data were collected until March 31, 2018. After exclusion of fetuses with aneuploidy and CNVs, 610 fetuses with structural anomalies and 1202 matched parental samples (analysed as 596 fetus-parental trios, including two sets of twins, and 14 fetus-parent dyads) were analysed by WES. After bioinformatic filtering and prioritisation according to allele frequency and effect on protein and inheritance pattern, 321 genetic variants (representing 255 potential diagnoses) were selected as potentially pathogenic genetic variants (diagnostic genetic variants), and these variants were reviewed by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel. A diagnostic genetic variant was identified in 52 (8·5%; 95% CI 6·4-11·0) of 610 fetuses assessed and an additional 24 (3·9%) fetuses had a variant of uncertain significance that had potential clinical usefulness. Detection of diagnostic genetic variants enabled us to distinguish between syndromic and non-syndromic fetal anomalies (eg, congenital heart disease only vs a syndrome with congenital heart disease and learning disability). Diagnostic genetic variants were present in 22 (15·4%) of 143 fetuses with multisystem anomalies (ie, more than one fetal structural anomaly), nine (11·1%) of 81 fetuses with cardiac anomalies, and ten (15·4%) of 65 fetuses with skeletal anomalies; these phenotypes were most commonly associated with diagnostic variants. However, diagnostic genetic variants were least common in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency (≥4·0 mm) in the first trimester (in three [3·2%] of 93 fetuses).
WES facilitates genetic diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, which enables more accurate predictions of fetal prognosis and risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. However, the overall detection of diagnostic genetic variants in a prospectively ascertained cohort with a broad range of fetal structural anomalies is lower than that suggested by previous smaller-scale studies of fewer phenotypes. WES improved the identification of genetic disorders in fetuses with structural abnormalities; however, before clinical implementation, careful consideration should be given to case selection to maximise clinical usefulness.
UK Department of Health and Social Care and The Wellcome Trust.
通过超声检查发现的胎儿结构异常具有多种遗传原因,包括染色体非整倍体、拷贝数变异(CNV;可通过染色体微阵列检测到)和发育基因中的致病性序列变异。在对胎儿结构异常进行调查时,通常会检测非整倍体和 CNV,但关于产前全基因组下一代测序在临床上的有用性的信息很少。因此,我们旨在评估通过全外显子组测序(WES)评估时,与发育障碍相关的基因中具有可识别变异的结构异常胎儿的比例。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,伯明翰和伦敦的两个小组从英格兰和苏格兰的 34 个胎儿医学单位招募了患者。我们使用全外显子组测序(WES)在排除非整倍体和大片段 CNV 后,在具有结构异常的胎儿及其父母的样本中评估了与发育障碍相关的基因(诊断性遗传变异)中是否存在遗传变异。如果女性在妊娠 11 周后通过超声检查发现颈后透明带增厚或胎儿结构异常,则有资格纳入研究。这些女性的伴侣也必须同意参与。测序结果使用包含 1628 个基因的针对发育障碍的靶向虚拟基因面板进行解释。与胎儿结构异常表型相关的遗传结果随后在产后进行验证和报告。主要终点是评估所有胎儿中被认为导致胎儿发育异常的诊断性遗传变异的检测。
该队列于 2014 年 10 月 22 日至 2017 年 6 月 29 日招募,临床数据收集截至 2018 年 3 月 31 日。排除非整倍体和 CNV 后,610 例结构异常胎儿和 1202 例匹配的父母样本(分析为 596 例胎儿-父母三联体,包括两组双胞胎和 14 例胎儿-父母二联体)通过 WES 进行分析。经过生物信息学过滤和根据等位基因频率以及对蛋白质的影响和遗传模式进行优先级排序后,选择了 321 个遗传变异(代表 255 个潜在诊断)作为潜在致病性遗传变异(诊断性遗传变异),并由多学科临床审查小组进行审查。在评估的 610 例胎儿中,有 52 例(8.5%;95%CI 6.4-11.0)发现了诊断性遗传变异,另外 24 例(3.9%)胎儿的变异具有潜在的临床有用性,但意义不明。检测到诊断性遗传变异使我们能够区分综合征性和非综合征性胎儿异常(例如,仅先天性心脏病与伴有先天性心脏病和学习障碍的综合征)。22 例(15.4%)多系统异常胎儿(即,超过一种胎儿结构异常)、9 例(11.1%)心脏异常胎儿和 10 例(15.4%)骨骼异常胎儿存在诊断性遗传变异;这些表型最常与诊断变异相关。然而,在具有孤立性颈后透明带增厚(≥4.0mm)的胎儿(93 例胎儿中有 3 例,3.2%)中,诊断性遗传变异最少见。
WES 促进了胎儿结构异常的基因诊断,这使得能够更准确地预测胎儿预后和未来妊娠的复发风险。然而,与之前针对较少表型的较小规模研究相比,在具有广泛胎儿结构异常的前瞻性确定队列中,总体检测到的诊断性遗传变异要低。WES 改善了对结构异常胎儿遗传疾病的识别;然而,在临床实施之前,应仔细考虑病例选择,以最大限度地提高临床有用性。
英国卫生部和社会关怀部以及惠康信托基金会。