Strassman Barbara K, Marashian Knar, Memon Zahra
Am Ann Deaf. 2019;163(5):501-533. doi: 10.1353/aad.2019.0001.
The authors culled evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for effective instruction from practice guides and national studies addressing the development of academic language in English Language Learners (ELLs). Working within the framework of the qualitative similarity hypothesis (Paul, Wang, & Williams, 2013), the authors used the evidence base from the ELL literature as a starting point for researching similar findings with d/Deaf students. The etic areas of academic talk, reading comprehension, vocabulary, writing, technology, teacher training, sheltered instruction, and small-group instruction are discussed. Given the parallels in findings (despite the lack of studies in d/Deaf education that meet the design standards for scientifically evidence-based research) between research with d/Deaf students and research with ELLs, the authors, like others in d/Deaf education, suggest that the field should employ the findings from the ELL research to nurture the use of academic language by d/Deaf students.
作者们从针对英语学习者(ELLs)学术语言发展的实践指南和全国性研究中挑选出基于证据的有效教学建议和指导方针。在质性相似性假设(保罗、王和威廉姆斯,2013年)的框架内,作者们将ELL文献中的证据基础作为研究聋生类似研究结果的起点。文中讨论了学术交流、阅读理解、词汇、写作、技术、教师培训、沉浸式教学和小组教学等普遍性领域。鉴于聋生研究与ELLs研究结果的相似性(尽管缺乏符合科学循证研究设计标准的聋教育研究),作者们与聋教育领域的其他人士一样,建议该领域应采用ELL研究的结果来促进聋生学术语言的使用。