Kanzow Philipp, Biermann Jana, Wiegand Annette
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2019;17(3):227-234. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a41811.
This questionnaire survey aimed to analyse management strategies for erosive tooth wear and to identify factors influencing dentists' decision-making.
A questionnaire presenting clinical cases with erosive tooth wear on anterior and posterior teeth (BEWE scores 1 to 3) was sent electronically to German dentists (n = 13.683). Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Kruskal-Wallis-tests and Fisher's exact tests (p <0.05).
Only 455 dentists (3.3%, mean age: 52.3 ± 9.6) participated. Suggested therapeutic measures were statistically significantly different between BEWE 1, 2 and 3 (p <0.001) and between anterior and posterior teeth with BEWE scores 1 or 2 (p ≤0.025). Initial erosive lesions (BEWE 1) were mainly treated by information about the main causes and/or preventive measures (posterior teeth: 75.6%, anterior teeth: 64.4%), only 20.0% and 31.3% considered restorative treatment for posterior and anterior teeth, respectively. For teeth presenting score 2, a very high proportion of dentists considered restorative treatment (posterior teeth: 60.6%) additionally to prevention, especially when anterior teeth (91.0%) were affected. In case of severe erosive lesions (BEWE 3), the vast majority of dentists considered restorative treatment (posterior teeth: 98.3%, anterior teeth: 99.8%). The decision-making was mainly dependent on the lesion depth, size of affected surfaces and the presence of pain. Fluoride agents and agents containing tin chloride or tin fluoride were most frequently recommended as preventive measures. If distinct defects (BEWE 2) were treated restoratively, mainly composite restorations were performed (posterior teeth: 72.0%, anterior teeth: 90.5%). Severe defects (BEWE 3) were mostly restored with ceramic restorations (posterior teeth: 66.1%, anterior teeth: 66.6%).
Stepwise management of erosive tooth wear was observed. Dentists' decision-making was related to severity and localisation of erosive tooth wear and to various patient-related factors (e.g. depth of lesion and size of affected surface per tooth).
本次问卷调查旨在分析牙齿磨损的管理策略,并确定影响牙医决策的因素。
通过电子邮件向德国牙医(n = 13683)发送一份问卷,问卷中呈现了前牙和后牙牙齿磨损的临床病例(牙齿磨损指数BEWE评分为1至3)。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Fisher精确检验进行统计分析(p <0.05)。
仅有455名牙医(3.3%,平均年龄:52.3±9.6)参与。在BEWE 1、2和3之间以及BEWE评分为1或2的前牙和后牙之间,建议的治疗措施在统计学上有显著差异(p <0.001,p≤0.025)。初始磨损病变(BEWE 1)主要通过告知主要病因和/或预防措施进行治疗(后牙:75.6%,前牙:64.4%),只有20.0%和31.3%的牙医分别考虑对后牙和前牙进行修复治疗。对于BEWE评分为2的牙齿,除预防外,很大比例的牙医考虑进行修复治疗(后牙:60.6%),尤其是在前牙受到影响时(91.0%)。对于严重磨损病变(BEWE 3),绝大多数牙医考虑进行修复治疗(后牙:98.3%,前牙:99.8%)。决策主要取决于病变深度、受影响表面的大小以及是否存在疼痛。氟化物制剂以及含氯化亚锡或氟化亚锡的制剂是最常推荐的预防措施。如果对明显缺损(BEWE 2)进行修复治疗,主要采用复合树脂修复(后牙:72.0%,前牙:90.5%)。严重缺损(BEWE 3)大多采用陶瓷修复(后牙:66.1%,前牙:66.6%)。
观察到牙齿磨损的逐步管理。牙医的决策与牙齿磨损的严重程度、部位以及各种患者相关因素(如病变深度和每颗牙齿受影响表面的大小)有关。