[Reliability of the correction index in the surgical indication for pectus excavatum].

OBJECTIVE

The Haller index (HI) is widely used to indicate surgical intervention in patients with pectus excavatum (PE). However, in patients with an atypical thoracic morphology, the severity of the defect can be incorrectly estimated. We propose comparing this index with the correction index (CI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed clinical data and CT scans of 50 patients who consulted for PE in our center between 2010 and 2017. Haller index (HI), Correction index (CI) and ideal thoracic index (ITI) were calculated for each patient. The ITI allowed dividing the sample into two groups based on the thoracic morphology by excluding the PE component, therefore separating those with thorax too wide or too narrow from the standard patients. A standard group (36 patients) and a non-standard group (14 patients) were generated, among which the HI and the CI were correlated.

RESULTS

The mean HI and CI of all patients were 3.99 and 27%, respectively. 31 of the 50 patients (62%) underwent intervention, 8 of them with an HI below 3.25. When comparing both groups, there was a moderate correlation between HI and CI in the standard group (Spearman r 0.799, p <0.01) and a greater correlation in the non-standard group (Spearman r 0.858, p <0.01).ween the scale and the presence of foreign body, except for SCORE 1, which was 57% what we attribute to an information bias. If the foreign body were not nuts, inorganic or bone, its aspiration was very unlikely, that is why we included it in the SCORE with -1.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, correlation of HI and CI was not different between both groups of patients. The CI did not prove its superiority when compared to HI in the surgical indication of patients with PE.