• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问题清单-29 通过伪装实验范式对四种不同症状表现进行的装病敏感性研究。

An Inventory of Problems-29 Sensitivity Study Investigating Feigning of Four Different Symptom Presentations Via Malingering Experimental Paradigm.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant International University.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2020 Jul-Aug;102(4):563-572. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1566914. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2019.1566914
PMID:30714835
Abstract

The Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) is a newly developed, self-administered test designed to assist practitioners evaluating the credibility of various symptom presentations. In a recent simulation study comparing real patients against experimental feigners, its classification accuracy compared favorably with that of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology and generalized better to different types of symptom reports (i.e., mood- or trauma-related vs. psychosis-related). Extending on these findings, this sensitivity study tested whether the IOP-29 would be similarly accurate in detecting feigning of conditions related to depression, mild traumatic brain injury, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and schizophrenia. Additionally, it also evaluated the susceptibility of the IOP-29 to uncooperative or random-like responding. Examination of 1,200 IOP-29 records from 400 nonclinical Italian volunteers who took the Italian version of the IOP-29 3 times, in 3 different conditions (i.e., standard instructions, feigned disorder, and random-like responding), confirmed that the IOP-29 might be similarly valid across a wide variety of mental health and cognitive complaints. Indeed, using the standard a priori cutoff of the IOP-29 (i.e., ≥ .50), sensitivity estimates ranged from .86 (for feigned PTSD) to .95 (for feigned depression) and did not significantly differ from one symptom presentation to another. These findings were obtained despite the fact that participants were coached to respond in a believable manner. Interestingly, the random-like responding generated extremely variable IOP-29 scores.

摘要

问题清单-29(IOP-29)是一种新开发的、自我管理的测试,旨在帮助评估者评估各种症状表现的可信度。在最近一项将真实患者与模拟装病者进行比较的模拟研究中,与结构伪装症状清单相比,其分类准确性相当,并且可以更好地推广到不同类型的症状报告(即,情绪或创伤相关与精神病相关)。在此基础上,这项敏感性研究测试了 IOP-29 是否能够同样准确地检测与抑郁、轻度创伤性脑损伤、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和精神分裂症相关的装病情况。此外,还评估了 IOP-29 对不合作或随机样反应的敏感性。对 400 名非临床意大利志愿者的 1200 份 IOP-29 记录进行了检查,这些志愿者在 3 种不同条件下(即标准说明、伪装障碍和随机样反应)3 次接受了 IOP-29 的意大利语版本,结果证实 IOP-29 可能在广泛的心理健康和认知障碍中具有相似的有效性。实际上,使用 IOP-29 的标准先验截止值(即≥0.50),灵敏度估计值从 0.86(假装 PTSD)到 0.95(假装抑郁)不等,并且与一种症状表现没有显著差异。尽管参与者接受了以可信方式回答的指导,但仍获得了这些发现。有趣的是,随机样反应产生了非常可变的 IOP-29 分数。

相似文献

1
An Inventory of Problems-29 Sensitivity Study Investigating Feigning of Four Different Symptom Presentations Via Malingering Experimental Paradigm.问题清单-29 通过伪装实验范式对四种不同症状表现进行的装病敏感性研究。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Jul-Aug;102(4):563-572. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1566914. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
The Development of the Inventory of Problems-29: A Brief Self-Administered Measure for Discriminating Bona Fide From Feigned Psychiatric and Cognitive Complaints.问题清单29的编制:一种用于区分真实与伪装的精神和认知主诉的简短自陈式测量工具。
J Pers Assess. 2017 Sep-Oct;99(5):534-544. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1233882. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Symptom coaching and symptom validity tests: An analog study using the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology, Self-Report Symptom Inventory, and Inventory of Problems-29.症状辅导和症状效度测试:使用伪装症状学结构化清单、自我报告症状量表和问题 29 清单的模拟研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):626-638. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2057856. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Classification accuracy and resistance to coaching of the Spanish version of the Inventory of Problems-29 and the Inventory of Problems-Memory: A simulation study with mTBI patients.《29 项问题清单-西班牙语版和记忆问题清单的分类准确性和抗教练影响:与 mTBI 患者的模拟研究》。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):738-762. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2249171. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
Detection of Feigning of Different Symptom Presentations With the PAI and IOP-29.使用 PAI 和 IOP-29 检测不同症状表现的伪装
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):565-579. doi: 10.1177/10731911211061282. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Using the inventory of problems - 29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners.在症状效度评估中使用问题清单-29(IOP-29)和记忆伪装测验(TOMM):一项针对葡萄牙实验性伪装者样本的研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(6):504-516. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1570929. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
7
The sensitivity of the IOP-29 and IOP-M to coached feigning of depression and mTBI: An online simulation study in a community sample from the United Kingdom.IOP-29 和 IOP-M 对抑郁和 mTBI 伪装的敏感性:来自英国社区样本的在线模拟研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Nov-Dec;31(6):1234-1246. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2115910. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
8
The Effectiveness of the Personality Assessment Inventory With Feigned PTSD: An Initial Investigation of Resnick's Model of Malingering.伪装创伤后应激障碍情况下人格评估量表的有效性:雷斯尼克诈病模型的初步调查
Assessment. 2015 Aug;22(4):449-58. doi: 10.1177/1073191114552076. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
9
An Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample.一项关于问题清单-29(IOP-29)的研究,该研究在一个英国社区样本中调查伪装的精神分裂症和随机反应。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 2;28(2):235-254. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720. eCollection 2021.
10
Detecting feigned postconcussional and posttraumatic stress symptoms with the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS).使用伪装症状结构化量表(SIMS)检测伪装的脑震荡后和创伤后应激症状。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2017 Sep-Oct;24(5):429-438. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2016.1189426. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Symptom and Performance Validity Assessment in European Countries: an Update.欧洲国家的症状与表现效度评估:最新情况
Psychol Inj Law. 2022;15(2):116-127. doi: 10.1007/s12207-021-09436-8. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
An Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample.一项关于问题清单-29(IOP-29)的研究,该研究在一个英国社区样本中调查伪装的精神分裂症和随机反应。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 2;28(2):235-254. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29.
问题清单29在线版与面对面施测的可比性和效度
Psychol Inj Law. 2021;14(2):77-88. doi: 10.1007/s12207-021-09406-0. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Psychometric Performance of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST) in Veteran PTSD Assessment.米勒法医症状评估测试(M-FAST)在退伍军人创伤后应激障碍评估中的心理测量学表现。
Psychol Inj Law. 2020 Apr 15;2020. doi: 10.1007/s12207-020-09373-y.