• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于问题清单-29(IOP-29)的研究,该研究在一个英国社区样本中调查伪装的精神分裂症和随机反应。

An Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample.

作者信息

Winters Christina L, Giromini Luciano, Crawford Trevor J, Ales Francesca, Viglione Donald J, Warmelink Lara

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 2;28(2):235-254. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720
PMID:34712094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8547855/
Abstract

Compared to other Western countries, malingering research is still relatively scarce in the United Kingdom, partly because only a few brief and easy-to-use symptom validity tests (SVTs) have been validated for use with British test-takers. This online study examined the validity of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) in detecting feigned schizophrenia and random responding in 151 British volunteers. Each participant took three IOP-29 test administrations: (a) responding honestly; (b) pretending to suffer from schizophrenia; and (c) responding at random. Additionally, they also responded to a schizotypy measure (O-LIFE) under standard instruction. The IOP-29's feigning scale (FDS) showed excellent validity in discriminating honest responding from feigned schizophrenia (AUC = .99), and its classification accuracy was not significantly affected by the presence of schizotypal traits. Additionally, a recently introduced IOP-29 scale aimed at detecting random responding (RRS) demonstrated very promising results.

摘要

与其他西方国家相比,诈病研究在英国仍然相对较少,部分原因是只有少数简短且易于使用的症状效度测试(SVT)已被验证可用于英国考生。这项在线研究检验了问题清单-29(IOP-29)在检测151名英国志愿者伪装精神分裂症和随机作答方面的效度。每位参与者进行了三次IOP-29测试:(a)诚实作答;(b)假装患有精神分裂症;(c)随机作答。此外,他们还在标准指导下对一种分裂型特质测量工具(O-LIFE)做出反应。IOP-29的诈病量表(FDS)在区分诚实作答和伪装精神分裂症方面显示出极佳的效度(曲线下面积 = 0.99),并且其分类准确性不受分裂型特质存在的显著影响。此外,最近推出的旨在检测随机作答的IOP-29量表(RRS)显示出非常有前景的结果。

相似文献

1
An Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample.一项关于问题清单-29(IOP-29)的研究,该研究在一个英国社区样本中调查伪装的精神分裂症和随机反应。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 2;28(2):235-254. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720. eCollection 2021.
2
An Inventory of Problems-29 Sensitivity Study Investigating Feigning of Four Different Symptom Presentations Via Malingering Experimental Paradigm.问题清单-29 通过伪装实验范式对四种不同症状表现进行的装病敏感性研究。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Jul-Aug;102(4):563-572. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1566914. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
The sensitivity of the IOP-29 and IOP-M to coached feigning of depression and mTBI: An online simulation study in a community sample from the United Kingdom.IOP-29 和 IOP-M 对抑郁和 mTBI 伪装的敏感性:来自英国社区样本的在线模拟研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Nov-Dec;31(6):1234-1246. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2115910. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
4
Development and Validation of the False Disorder Score: The Focal Scale of the Inventory of Problems.虚假障碍评分的制定与验证:问题清单的焦点量表。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Nov-Dec;101(6):653-661. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1492413. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Detection of Feigning of Different Symptom Presentations With the PAI and IOP-29.使用 PAI 和 IOP-29 检测不同症状表现的伪装
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):565-579. doi: 10.1177/10731911211061282. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems - 29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT).一项使用《问题清单 29 项》(IOP-29)、其记忆模块(IOP-M)和 Rey 十五项测试(FIT)对伪装性 mTBI 的澳大利亚研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Sep-Oct;29(5):1221-1230. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1864375. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Symptom coaching and symptom validity tests: An analog study using the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology, Self-Report Symptom Inventory, and Inventory of Problems-29.症状辅导和症状效度测试:使用伪装症状学结构化清单、自我报告症状量表和问题 29 清单的模拟研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):626-638. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2057856. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
8
Accuracy of MMPI-2-RF validity scales for identifying feigned PTSD symptoms, random responding, and genuine PTSD.MMPI-2-RF 效度量表识别伪装 PTSD 症状、随机反应和真实 PTSD 的准确性。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(6):585-93. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.819512. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
9
Using the inventory of problems - 29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners.在症状效度评估中使用问题清单-29(IOP-29)和记忆伪装测验(TOMM):一项针对葡萄牙实验性伪装者样本的研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(6):504-516. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1570929. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
10
A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania.在立陶宛使用问题清单-29(IOP-29)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)进行的临床比较模拟研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Mar-Apr;29(2):155-162. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1725518. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29.问题清单29在线版与面对面施测的可比性和效度
Psychol Inj Law. 2021;14(2):77-88. doi: 10.1007/s12207-021-09406-0. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania.在立陶宛使用问题清单-29(IOP-29)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)进行的临床比较模拟研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Mar-Apr;29(2):155-162. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1725518. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
An Inventory of Problems-29 Study on Random Responding Using Experimental Feigners, Honest Controls, and Computer-Generated Data.问题清单-29 项 使用实验伪装者、诚实对照组和计算机生成数据进行随机反应研究。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Nov-Dec;102(6):731-742. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1639188. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
Using the inventory of problems - 29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners.在症状效度评估中使用问题清单-29(IOP-29)和记忆伪装测验(TOMM):一项针对葡萄牙实验性伪装者样本的研究。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(6):504-516. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1570929. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
4
An Inventory of Problems-29 Sensitivity Study Investigating Feigning of Four Different Symptom Presentations Via Malingering Experimental Paradigm.问题清单-29 通过伪装实验范式对四种不同症状表现进行的装病敏感性研究。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Jul-Aug;102(4):563-572. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1566914. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Diagnosis and treatment of schizotypal personality disorder: evidence from a systematic review.分裂型人格障碍的诊断与治疗:一项系统评价的证据
NPJ Schizophr. 2018 Oct 3;4(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41537-018-0062-8.
6
Reexamining performance validity cutoffs within the Complex Ideational Material and the Boston Naming Test-Short Form using an experimental malingering paradigm.使用实验性伪装范式重新审视复杂意念材料和波士顿命名测验-简短形式中的表现有效性截止值。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb;41(1):15-25. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1483488. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
7
Utility of the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale validity scales in identifying simulated attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and random responding.康纳斯成人多动症评定量表效度量表在识别模拟注意缺陷多动障碍和随机反应中的效用。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Dec;29(12):1437-1446. doi: 10.1037/pas0000530.
8
The Development of the Inventory of Problems-29: A Brief Self-Administered Measure for Discriminating Bona Fide From Feigned Psychiatric and Cognitive Complaints.问题清单29的编制:一种用于区分真实与伪装的精神和认知主诉的简短自陈式测量工具。
J Pers Assess. 2017 Sep-Oct;99(5):534-544. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1233882. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
9
[Formula: see text]Neuropsychologists' Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals.[公式:见正文]神经心理学家的效度测试信念与实践:北美专业人士调查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(6):741-76. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
10
"False feigners": Examining the impact of non-content-based invalid responding on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form content-based invalid responding indicators.“伪装者”:探究基于非内容的无效作答对明尼苏达多相人格量表-2修订版基于内容的无效作答指标的影响。
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):458-70. doi: 10.1037/pas0000205. Epub 2015 Aug 24.