Qin Yanyan, Wang Hao
a Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS , Southeast University , Nanjing , P. R. China.
b Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies , Nanjing , P. R. China.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):79-83. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1527469. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
Connected and automated vehicles (CAV) can monitor multiple vehicles ahead via vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication. Although feedback information from more vehicles ahead may be more helpful for anticipations, it also makes control more complex and increases the probability of data packet loss. Then it needs an appropriate number of CAV feedback links, and the maximum number may be not suitable. Therefore, this article focuses on the influence of CAV feedback links on rear-end collision risks.
To deal with this, stability analysis of a CAV car-following model was conducted to obtain the designs of CAV feedback gains for maintaining stable CAV flow. Simulation experiments were performed to describe a traffic accident on freeway, using car-following models of manually driven vehicles (MDVs) and CAV under different CAV penetration rates. Four scenarios are considered in simulation experiments; that is, the CAV monitors 1, 2, 3, and 4 preceding vehicles, respectively. Based on the simulation experiments, surrogate safety indicators, time-exposed time-to-collision (TET), and time-integrated time-to-collision (TIT) are used to evaluate risks of rear-end collisions.
Results indicated that CAV helped to decrease the collision risks, especially the more serious collision risks with smaller threshold values of time-to-collision (TTC). In addition, the reductions in collision risks are more obvious when CAV feedback changes from one link to 2 links. In addition, reducing amplitudes are not significant if the CAV feedback is extended from 2 links to 3 or 4 links.
Two links of CAV feedback are appropriate when control complexity is a priority, whereas 3 links is the better choice when reductions in collisions are a priority. The findings of this study provide helpful reference for CAV control and design before larger-scale implementation in real vehicles.
联网自动驾驶车辆(CAV)可通过车对车(V2V)通信监测前方多辆车。尽管来自更多前方车辆的反馈信息可能对预测更有帮助,但这也会使控制更加复杂,并增加数据包丢失的概率。因此需要适当数量的CAV反馈链路,最大数量可能并不合适。所以,本文重点研究CAV反馈链路对追尾碰撞风险的影响。
为解决此问题,对CAV跟驰模型进行稳定性分析,以获得用于维持稳定CAV车流的CAV反馈增益设计。利用不同CAV渗透率下的人工驾驶车辆(MDV)和CAV的跟驰模型进行仿真实验,描述高速公路上的交通事故。仿真实验考虑了四种场景,即CAV分别监测前方1、2、3和4辆车。基于仿真实验,使用替代安全指标、时间暴露碰撞时间(TET)和时间积分碰撞时间(TIT)来评估追尾碰撞风险。
结果表明,CAV有助于降低碰撞风险,尤其是对于碰撞时间(TTC)阈值较小的更严重碰撞风险。此外,当CAV反馈从一个链路增加到2个链路时,碰撞风险的降低更为明显。另外,如果CAV反馈从2个链路增加到3个或4个链路,降低幅度并不显著。
当控制复杂性是首要考虑因素时,2个CAV反馈链路是合适的;而当降低碰撞风险是首要考虑因素时,3个链路是更好的选择。本研究结果为CAV在实际车辆中大规模应用之前的控制和设计提供了有益参考。