1Department of Neurosurgery, SanBo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
2Department of Neurosurgery, Stroke Center, Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Feb 1;46(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2018.11.FOCUS18457.
OBJECTIVEThe rapid innovation of the endovascular armamentarium results in a decreased number of indications for a classic surgical approach. However, a middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm remains the best example of one for which results have favored microsurgery over endovascular intervention. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the experience and efficacy regarding surgical outcomes after applying internal maxillary artery (IMA) bypass for complex MCA aneurysms (CMCAAs).METHODSAll IMA bypasses performed between January 2010 and July 2018 in a single-center, single-surgeon practice were screened.RESULTSIn total, 12 patients (9 males, 3 females) with CMCAAs managed by high-flow IMA bypass were identified. The mean size of CMCAAs was 23.7 mm (range 10-37 mm), and the patients had a mean age of 31.7 years (range 14-56 years). The aneurysms were proximally occluded in 8 cases, completely trapped in 3 cases, and completely resected in 1 case. The radial artery was used as the graft vessel in all cases. At discharge, the graft patency rate was 83.3% (n = 10), and all aneurysms were completely eliminated (83.3%, n = 10) or greatly diminished (16.7%, n = 2) from the circulation. Postoperative ischemia was detected in 2 patients as a result of graft occlusion, and 1 patient presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage achieved improved modified Rankin Scale scores compared to the preoperative status but retained some neurological deficits. Therefore, neurological assessment at discharge showed that 9 of the 12 patients experienced unremarkable outcomes. The mean interval time from bypass to angiographic and clinical follow-up was 28.7 months (range 2-74 months) and 53.1 months (range 19-82 months), respectively. Although 2 grafts remained occluded, all aneurysms were isolated from the circulation, and no patient had an unfavorable outcome.CONCLUSIONSThe satisfactory result in the present study demonstrated that IMA bypass is a promising method for the treatment of CMCAAs and should be maintained in the neurosurgical armamentarium. However, cases with intraoperative radical resection or inappropriate bypass recipient selection such as aneurysmal wall should be meticulously chosen with respect to the subtype of MCA aneurysm.
血管内治疗手段的快速创新导致经典手术适应证的数量减少。然而,大脑中动脉(MCA)动脉瘤仍然是最好的例子,其治疗结果倾向于显微手术而非血管内介入。在这项研究中,作者旨在评估在单一中心、单外科医生实践中应用内上颌动脉(IMA)旁路治疗复杂 MCA 动脉瘤(CMCAAs)的经验和疗效。
筛选了 2010 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月期间在单中心、单外科医生实践中进行的所有 IMA 旁路手术。
共发现 12 例(9 例男性,3 例女性)CMCAAs 患者接受高流量 IMA 旁路治疗。CMCAAs 的平均大小为 23.7mm(范围 10-37mm),患者平均年龄为 31.7 岁(范围 14-56 岁)。8 例动脉瘤近端闭塞,3 例完全闭塞,1 例完全切除。所有病例均使用桡动脉作为移植物血管。出院时,移植血管通畅率为 83.3%(n=10),所有动脉瘤均完全消除(83.3%,n=10)或明显缩小(16.7%,n=2)。2 例患者因吻合口闭塞导致术后缺血,1 例蛛网膜下腔出血患者改良 Rankin 量表评分较术前改善,但仍有部分神经功能缺损。因此,出院时的神经功能评估显示,12 例患者中有 9 例预后良好。从旁路到血管造影和临床随访的平均间隔时间分别为 28.7 个月(范围 2-74 个月)和 53.1 个月(范围 19-82 个月)。尽管有 2 个吻合口仍然闭塞,但所有动脉瘤均与循环隔离,无患者出现不良预后。
本研究的满意结果表明,IMA 旁路是治疗 CMCAAs 的一种很有前途的方法,应保留在神经外科治疗手段中。然而,对于 MCA 动脉瘤的亚型,术中应仔细选择如动脉瘤壁等具有根治性切除或不适当吻合口受者选择的病例。