Yaghmour Khaled M, Chisari Emanuele, Khan Wasim S
Division of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 2;8(2):174. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020174.
Periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty is a significant complication that is a common reason for revision surgery. The current standard of care is two-stage revision surgery. There is however increasing evidence to support the use of single-stage revision surgery. We conducted a PRISMA systematic review of the current evidence on the use of single-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library) were systematically screened for eligible studies. The risk bias of each study was identified using ROBINS-I tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. Sixteen articles were retained after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria that evaluated 3645 knee single-stage revision surgeries. Our review reveals satisfactory outcomes for single-stage revision in the management of infected total knee arthroplasty. The reinfection rates in the studies included in our review varied however the majority reported low reinfection rates and good functional outcomes. Although strict patient selection criteria have yielded successful results, good results were also reported when these criteria were not applied. The greater use of risk factors in identifying patients likely to have a successful outcome needs to be balanced with the practical benefits of performing a single stage procedure in higher risk patients. Future large clinical randomized control trials are required to confirm our results.
全膝关节置换术中的假体周围感染是一种严重并发症,也是翻修手术的常见原因。目前的治疗标准是两阶段翻修手术。然而,越来越多的证据支持使用单阶段翻修手术。我们对目前关于感染性全膝关节置换术单阶段翻修使用的证据进行了PRISMA系统评价。系统检索了四个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Science Direct和Cochrane图书馆)以查找符合条件的研究。使用ROBINS-I工具确定每项研究的风险偏倚,并使用GRADE标准评估证据质量。在应用纳入和排除标准后,保留了16篇评估3645例膝关节单阶段翻修手术的文章。我们的评价显示,单阶段翻修在感染性全膝关节置换术的治疗中取得了令人满意的结果。我们评价中纳入的研究中的再感染率各不相同,然而大多数报告的再感染率较低且功能结果良好。虽然严格的患者选择标准取得了成功的结果,但在未应用这些标准时也报告了良好的结果。在识别可能获得成功结果的患者时更多地使用风险因素,需要与在高风险患者中进行单阶段手术的实际益处相平衡。未来需要大型临床随机对照试验来证实我们的结果。