School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1115. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37918-4.
Perception is modulated by ongoing brain oscillations. Psychophysical studies show a voluntary action can synchronize oscillations, producing rhythmical fluctuations of visual contrast sensitivity. We used signal detection to examine whether voluntary action could also synchronize oscillations in decision criterion, and whether that was due to the oscillations of perceptual bias or of motor bias. Trials started with a voluntary button-press. After variable time lags, a grating at threshold contrast was presented briefly and participants discriminated its orientation (45° or -45°) with a mouse-click. Two groups of participants completed the experiment with opposite mappings between grating orientations and response buttons. We calculated sensitivity and criterion in the 800 ms period following the button press. To test for oscillations, we fitted first-order Fourier series to these time series. Alpha oscillations occurred in both sensitivity and criterion at different frequencies: ~8 Hz (sensitivity) and ~10 Hz (criterion). Sensitivity oscillations had the same phase for both stimulus-response mappings. Criterion oscillations, however, showed a strong anti-phase relationship when the two groups were compared, suggesting a motor bias rather than perceptual bias. Our findings suggest two roles for alpha oscillations: in sensitivity, reflecting rhythmic attentional inhibition, and in criterion, indicating dynamic motor-related anticipation or preparation.
知觉受大脑持续振荡的调节。心理物理学研究表明,自愿行动可以使振荡同步,产生视觉对比敏感度的节律性波动。我们使用信号检测来检验自愿行动是否也能使决策标准的振荡同步,以及这是否是由于知觉偏差还是运动偏差的振荡所致。试验从自愿按按钮开始。在可变的时滞后,一个阈值对比度的光栅短暂呈现,参与者通过鼠标点击来辨别其方向(45°或-45°)。两组参与者用光栅方向和响应按钮之间的相反映射完成了实验。我们在按钮按下后的 800ms 时间段内计算了敏感性和标准。为了测试振荡,我们将一阶傅里叶级数拟合到这些时间序列中。在不同频率下,α 振荡出现在敏感性和标准中:8Hz(敏感性)和10Hz(标准)。对于两种刺激-反应映射,敏感性振荡具有相同的相位。然而,当比较两组时,标准振荡显示出强烈的反相关系,这表明是运动偏差而不是知觉偏差。我们的研究结果表明α 振荡有两个作用:在敏感性中,反映节律性注意力抑制,在标准中,表明动态与运动相关的预期或准备。