• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓解新型肿瘤药物卫生技术评估中支付方不确定性的视角。

Perspectives to mitigate payer uncertainty in health technology assessment of novel oncology drugs.

作者信息

Solà-Morales Oriol, Volmer Timm, Mantovani Lorenzo

机构信息

Health Innovation Technology Transfer and International, University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

SmartStep Consulting GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Jan 22;7(1):1562861. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1562861. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1080/20016689.2018.1562861
PMID:30719243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6346722/
Abstract

Reimbursement decisions on new oncology drugs are now often made while uncertainty remains about a drug's risk-benefit profile. One consequence of this is a delay in patient access to valuable new medicines. We share our perspectives on strategies to mitigate sources of uncertainty in the health technology assessment process. These include flexible approaches for evaluating the additional benefit, such as better use of surrogate endpoints and health-related quality of life data, and renewed research efforts to define the optimal target population and generate real-world evidence post-authorisation.

摘要

目前,在对新型肿瘤药物的风险效益状况仍存在不确定性的情况下,往往就会做出报销决定。这样做的一个后果是患者在获取有价值的新药方面出现延迟。我们就减轻卫生技术评估过程中不确定性来源的策略分享我们的观点。这些策略包括评估额外效益的灵活方法,如更好地利用替代终点和与健康相关的生活质量数据,以及重新开展研究工作,以确定最佳目标人群并在获批后生成真实世界证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d49a/6346722/dc09f64842e0/ZJMA_A_1562861_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d49a/6346722/dc09f64842e0/ZJMA_A_1562861_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d49a/6346722/dc09f64842e0/ZJMA_A_1562861_F0001_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Perspectives to mitigate payer uncertainty in health technology assessment of novel oncology drugs.缓解新型肿瘤药物卫生技术评估中支付方不确定性的视角。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Jan 22;7(1):1562861. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1562861. eCollection 2019.
2
Oncology drugs and added benefit: insights from 3 European health technology assessment agencies on the role of efficacy endpoints.肿瘤药物和附加效益:3 家欧洲卫生技术评估机构对疗效终点作用的看法
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2009711.
3
The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?肿瘤学报销决策中总生存期的僵局:我们如何解决这个问题?
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Nov 10;13:8457-8471. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S328058. eCollection 2021.
4
Analysis of endpoints used in marketing authorisations versus value assessments of oncology medicines in Germany.德国肿瘤药物上市许可所用终点与价值评估的分析
Health Policy. 2014 Nov;118(2):242-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
5
Factors Influencing Delays in Patient Access to New Medicines in Canada: A Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Processes in Public Drug Plans.影响加拿大患者获取新药延迟的因素:公共药品计划报销流程的回顾性研究
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 29;10:196. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00196. eCollection 2019.
6
Relative effectiveness assessments of oncology medicines for pricing and reimbursement decisions in European countries.在欧洲国家,用于定价和报销决策的肿瘤药物的相对有效性评估。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(9):1768-75. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw233. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
7
Variation in Health Technology Assessment and Reimbursement Processes in Europe.欧洲卫生技术评估与报销流程的差异
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.725. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?如何预测对新药公共卫生效益的评估?
Therapie. 2007 Sep-Oct;62(5):427-35. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2007071. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
9
Health Technology Assessment Challenges in Oncology: 20 Years of Value in Health.肿瘤学中的卫生技术评估挑战:健康价值 20 年。
Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.001.
10
[Cancer: Is it really so different? Particularities of oncologic drugs from the perspective of the pharmaceutical regulatory agency].[癌症:真的如此不同吗?从药品监管机构的角度看肿瘤药物的特殊性]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(2):120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Do trial benefits predict real-world gains in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.试验中的获益能否预测转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌在现实世界中的疗效?
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Mar 3;9(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf018.
2
The NYMERIA Study: A Real-World, Multicentre Contemporary Assessment of Disease- and Patient-Related Burden and Treatment Strategies in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.NYMERIA研究:对系统性红斑狼疮患者疾病及患者相关负担与治疗策略的真实世界、多中心当代评估
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2024 Jun 30;35(Suppl 2):392-401. doi: 10.31138/mjr.160524.tns. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
The evolving value assessment of cancer therapies: Results from a modified Delphi study.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting patients self-managing respiratory health: a qualitative study on the impact of the Breathe Easy voluntary group network.支持患者自我管理呼吸健康:关于“轻松呼吸”自愿团体网络影响的定性研究
ERJ Open Res. 2018 Feb 9;4(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00076-2017. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Systematic review and benchmarking of Quality-Adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) in oncology.肿瘤学中无症状或毒性的质量调整时间(Q-TWiST)的系统评价与基准分析
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun;18(3):245-253. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1434414. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
3
The option value of innovative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma.
癌症治疗的价值评估演变:一项改良德尔菲研究的结果
Health Policy Open. 2024 Mar 1;6:100116. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100116. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Patient preferences do matter: a discrete choice experiment conducted with breast cancer patients in six European countries, with latent class analysis.患者偏好确实很重要:一项在六个欧洲国家进行的针对乳腺癌患者的离散选择实验,采用潜在类别分析。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Apr 19;39(1):e21. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000168.
5
An Investigation into the Relationship Between Choice of Model Structure and How to Adjust for Subsequent Therapies Using a Case Study in Oncology.利用肿瘤学案例研究对模型结构选择与后续治疗调整方法之间的关系进行调查。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00792-x. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Considerations for the Utility of Real-World Evidence Beyond Trial Data in Advanced NSCLC: The Case of Frontline Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.晚期非小细胞肺癌中超越试验数据的真实世界证据的效用考量:一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的案例
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Dec 7;14:3421-3435. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S380857. eCollection 2022.
7
The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?肿瘤学报销决策中总生存期的僵局:我们如何解决这个问题?
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Nov 10;13:8457-8471. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S328058. eCollection 2021.
8
Integrative Review of Managed Entry Agreements: Chances and Limitations.综合管理准入协议审查:机遇与限制。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Nov;38(11):1165-1185. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00943-1.
9
Cost-effectiveness and financial risks associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.与免疫检查点抑制剂疗法相关的成本效益和财务风险。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;86(9):1703-1710. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14337. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
10
Critical Factors Shaping Strategy Development of an Innovative Medicine in Oncology.影响肿瘤创新药物研发策略制定的关键因素
Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Apr;34(2):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00328-x.
非小细胞肺癌和肾细胞癌创新治疗的期权价值。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Oct 1;23(10):e340-e346.
4
Availability of evidence of benefits on overall survival and quality of life of cancer drugs approved by European Medicines Agency: retrospective cohort study of drug approvals 2009-13.欧洲药品管理局批准的癌症药物对总生存期和生活质量有益的证据可得性:2009 - 2013年药物批准情况的回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Oct 4;359:j4530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4530.
5
Oncology Drug Approvals: Evaluating Endpoints and Evidence in an Era of Breakthrough Therapies.肿瘤药物审批:在突破性治疗时代评估终点和证据。
Oncologist. 2017 Jul;22(7):762-767. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0152. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
6
Managed Entry Agreements for Oncology Drugs: Lessons from the European Experience to Inform the Future.肿瘤药物的准入管理协议:欧洲经验对未来的启示
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Apr 4;8:171. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00171. eCollection 2017.
7
Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer at Academic Medical Centers: Involvement in Clinical Trial Endpoint Design.学术医疗中心晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗模式:参与临床试验终点设计。
Oncologist. 2017 Jun;22(6):700-708. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0345. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
8
Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in lung cancer trials: a review.肺癌试验中总生存期的替代终点:综述
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017 May;17(5):447-454. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1316196. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
Differences in Treatment Effect Size Between Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Immunotherapy Trials: A Meta-Epidemiologic Study of Trials With Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov.免疫治疗试验中总生存与无进展生存治疗效果大小的差异:一项在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上公布结果的试验的荟萃流行病学研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 20;35(15):1686-1694. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.2109. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
10
Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.伊马替尼治疗慢性髓性白血病的长期疗效
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 9;376(10):917-927. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609324.