• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响肿瘤创新药物研发策略制定的关键因素

Critical Factors Shaping Strategy Development of an Innovative Medicine in Oncology.

机构信息

Apogenix AG, VP Global Head Medical Affairs, Im Neuenheimer Feld 584, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Sandoz (Part of Novartis), Global Clinical Development Manager, 83607, Holzkirchen, Germany.

出版信息

Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Apr;34(2):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00328-x.

DOI:10.1007/s40290-020-00328-x
PMID:32107738
Abstract

Innovative medicinal products are required to achieve progress in oncology; however, these are associated with high financial investments, extensive development times, and significant risk of potential failure in the pivotal clinical trials required for marketing authorization. With increasing budgetary constraints and requirements to demonstrate value, effective strategies to develop and commercialize innovative oncology products are more important than ever. Strategies that have proved successful in other industries require major revision for use in the oncology field, both during preclinical and clinical development as well as in the post approval value chain. This paper will examine how medicinal product strategy development differs from other industries. In particular, it will look at how the global trend toward value-based healthcare requires strategies that are based on an in-depth scientific understanding of the disease area and product-specific characteristics supported by clinical evidence. The findings are complemented by a review of the available literature and a survey of industry representatives.

摘要

创新药物是肿瘤学取得进展所必需的;然而,这些药物与高财务投资、广泛的开发时间以及在获得营销授权所需的关键临床试验中潜在失败的巨大风险相关联。随着预算限制的增加和对价值的证明的要求,开发和商业化创新肿瘤产品的有效策略比以往任何时候都更加重要。在肿瘤学领域,在临床前和临床开发以及批准后价值链中,在其他行业中被证明成功的策略需要进行重大修改。本文将探讨药物策略开发如何与其他行业不同。特别是,它将研究全球向基于价值的医疗保健的趋势如何要求基于对疾病领域和产品特定特征的深入科学理解的策略,这些策略得到临床证据的支持。研究结果还辅以对现有文献的回顾和对行业代表的调查。

相似文献

1
Critical Factors Shaping Strategy Development of an Innovative Medicine in Oncology.影响肿瘤创新药物研发策略制定的关键因素
Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Apr;34(2):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00328-x.
2
Medical Affairs and Innovative Medicinal Product Strategy Development.医学事务和创新药物产品策略制定。
Pharmaceut Med. 2022 Apr;36(2):71-82. doi: 10.1007/s40290-022-00424-0. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
3
Innovation in oncology clinical trial design.肿瘤临床试验设计的创新。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 Mar;74:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
[Scientific advice by the nationally competent authority and by the EMEA on the conduct of clinical trials].国家主管当局和欧洲药品管理局就临床试验开展提供的科学建议
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Apr;48(4):423-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-005-1022-9.
5
Clinical cancer advances 2011: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology.临床肿瘤进展 2011:美国临床肿瘤学会癌症进展年度报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 1;30(1):88-109. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1919. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
6
[Early achievements of the Danish pharmaceutical industry--8. Lundbeck].[丹麦制药行业的早期成就——8. 灵北公司]
Theriaca. 2016(43):9-61.
7
Paediatric Strategy Forum for medicinal product development of epigenetic modifiers for children: ACCELERATE in collaboration with the European Medicines Agency with participation of the Food and Drug Administration.儿童表观遗传修饰剂药品开发儿科战略论坛:加速计划,与欧洲药品管理局合作,美国食品药品监督管理局参与
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Nov;139:135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
Paediatric Strategy Forum for medicinal product development for acute myeloid leukaemia in children and adolescents: ACCELERATE in collaboration with the European Medicines Agency with participation of the Food and Drug Administration.儿科药物研发策略论坛:急性髓系白血病儿童和青少年药物研发:与欧洲药品管理局合作,美国食品药品监督管理局参与,简称 ACCELERATE。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;136:116-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.038. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
Prospects of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products-Based Therapies in Regenerative Dentistry: Current Status, Comparison with Global Trends in Medicine, and Future Perspectives.基于先进治疗药物的再生牙科治疗的前景:现状、与全球医学趋势的比较及未来展望。
J Endod. 2020 Sep;46(9S):S175-S188. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Early access provision: Awareness, educational needs and opportunities to improve oncology patients' access to care.早期准入规定:提高肿瘤患者就医机会的认知、教育需求及机遇
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 26;12:714516. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.714516. eCollection 2022.
2
Value of Adaptive Trials and Surrogate Endpoints for Clinical Decision-Making in Rare Cancers.适应性试验和替代终点在罕见癌症临床决策中的价值
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 8;11:636561. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.636561. eCollection 2021.
3
Early Access Provision for Innovative Medicinal Products in Oncology: Challenges and Opportunities.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives to mitigate payer uncertainty in health technology assessment of novel oncology drugs.缓解新型肿瘤药物卫生技术评估中支付方不确定性的视角。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Jan 22;7(1):1562861. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1562861. eCollection 2019.
2
Comparative Assessment of Clinical Benefit Using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score.使用 ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale 版本 1.1 和 ASCO 价值框架净健康获益评分对临床获益进行比较评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):336-349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00729. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
肿瘤学创新药物的早期准入规定:挑战与机遇
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 2;10:1604. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01604. eCollection 2020.
Clinical Cancer Advances 2019: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
《2019年临床癌症进展:美国临床肿瘤学会抗癌进展年度报告》
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;37(10):834-849. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02037. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
4
Evidence-Based Valuation in Oncology:: Lessons Learned from a Case Study.肿瘤学中的循证评估:来自一个案例研究的经验教训
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 May;53(3):403-411. doi: 10.1177/2168479018786701. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Value Frameworks in Oncology: Comparative Analysis and Implications to the Pharmaceutical Industry.肿瘤学中的价值框架:比较分析及其对制药行业的影响
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Jul;10(5):253-260.
6
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1.ESMO-临床获益量表 1.1 版
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2340-2366. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx310.
7
Research and Development Spending to Bring a Single Cancer Drug to Market and Revenues After Approval.研发一种抗癌药物上市的支出及获批后的收入。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1569-1575. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3601.
8
Definitions and statistical properties of master protocols for personalized medicine in oncology.肿瘤个性化医疗主方案的定义及统计学特性
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(2):217-228. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1372778. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
9
The Affordable Care Act's Impacts on Access to Insurance and Health Care for Low-Income Populations.《平价医疗法案》对低收入人群保险获取和医疗保健的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:489-505. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044555. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
10
How to Pay for Health Care.如何支付医疗费用。
Harv Bus Rev. 2016 Jul-Aug;94(7-8):88-98, 100, 134.