Fraunhofer IGB, Stuttgart, Germany.
Noscendo GmbH, Duisburg, Germany.
Crit Care Med. 2019 May;47(5):e394-e402. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003658.
Culture-based diagnostics represent the standard of care in septic patients, but are highly insensitive and in many cases unspecific. We recently demonstrated the general feasibility of next-generation sequencing-based diagnostics using free circulating nucleic acids (cell-free DNA) in plasma samples of septic patients. Within the presented investigation, higher performance of next-generation sequencing-based diagnostics was validated by comparison to matched blood cultures.
A secondary analysis of a prospective, observational, single-center study.
Surgical ICU of a university hospital and research laboratory.
Fifty patients with septic shock, 20 uninfected patients with elective surgery as control cohort.
None.
From 256 plasma samples of 48 septic patients at up to seven consecutive time points within the 28-day observation period, cell-free DNA was isolated and analyzed by next-generation sequencing and relevance scoring. In parallel, results from culture-based diagnostics (e.g., blood culture) were obtained. Plausibility of blood culture and next-generation sequencing results as well as adequacy of antibiotic therapy was evaluated by an independent expert panel. In contrast to blood culture with a positivity rate of 33% at sepsis onset, the positivity rate for next-generation sequencing-based pathogen identification was 72%. Over the whole study period, blood culture positivity was 11%, and next-generation sequencing positivity was 71%. Ninety-six percent of positive next-generation sequencing results for acute sepsis time points were plausible and would have led to a change to a more adequate therapy in 53% of cases as assessed by the expert evaluation.
Our results show that next-generation sequencing-based analyses of bloodstream infections provide a valuable diagnostic platform for the identification of clinically relevant pathogens with higher sensitivity and specificity than blood culture, indicating that patients might benefit from a more appropriate therapy based on next-generation sequencing-based diagnosis.
基于培养的诊断方法是脓毒症患者的标准治疗方法,但高度不敏感,在许多情况下特异性差。我们最近证明了使用脓毒症患者血浆样本中的游离循环核酸(无细胞 DNA)进行基于下一代测序的诊断的一般可行性。在本研究中,通过与匹配的血培养进行比较,验证了基于下一代测序的诊断的更高性能。
一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究的二次分析。
大学医院的外科重症监护病房和研究实验室。
50 例脓毒性休克患者,20 例接受择期手术的未感染患者作为对照队列。
无。
在 28 天观察期内,从 48 例脓毒症患者的 256 个血浆样本中,在多达七个连续时间点分离和分析无细胞 DNA,并进行下一代测序和相关性评分。同时,获得了基于培养的诊断(例如血培养)的结果。通过一个独立的专家小组评估血培养和下一代测序结果的合理性以及抗生素治疗的充分性。与脓毒症发病时阳性率为 33%的血培养相比,基于下一代测序的病原体鉴定的阳性率为 72%。在整个研究期间,血培养的阳性率为 11%,而基于下一代测序的阳性率为 71%。在急性脓毒症时间点,96%的阳性下一代测序结果是合理的,根据专家评估,在 53%的情况下,这将导致更适当的治疗改变。
我们的结果表明,基于下一代测序的血流感染分析为鉴定具有更高敏感性和特异性的临床相关病原体提供了有价值的诊断平台,表明患者可能受益于基于下一代测序的诊断进行更适当的治疗。