Wang Qing-Wei, Daumal Maya, Nagano Soichiro, Yoshida Naofumi, Morinaga Shin-Ichi, Hikosaka Kouki
Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan.
Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8687, Japan.
J Plant Res. 2019 Mar;132(2):237-249. doi: 10.1007/s10265-019-01088-9. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
In mountainous areas, plant distribution is constrained by various environmental stresses. Plasticity and constancy in plant functional traits may relate to optimal strategies at respective habitats and to ecotypic differentiation along elevation. Although plant biomass allocation has been extensively studied in relation to adaptation to soil nutrient availability along elevation, its optimality is still poorly understood. We examined soil nutrient availability in the field and conducted growth analysis for two elevational ecotypes of Arabidopsis halleri grown under different nutrient availabilities. We determined plasticity in morphological and physiological traits and evaluated optimal biomass allocation using an optimality model. Our field investigation indicated that soil nitrogen (N) availability increased rather than decreased with increasing elevation. Our growth analysis revealed that lowland ecotype was more plastic in morphological variables and N concentrations, whereas the highland ecotype was more plastic in other physiological variables such as the net assimilation rate (NAR). The leaf mass ratio (LMR) in the lowland ecotype was moderately plastic at the whole range of N availabilities, whereas LMR in the highland ecotype was very plastic at higher N availabilities only. The optimality model indicated that the LMR of the lowland ecotype was nearly optimal throughout the range of studied N availabilities, whereas that of the highland ecotype was suboptimal at low N availability. These results suggest that highland ecotype is adapted only to high N availability, whereas the lowland ecotype is adapted to a relatively wide range of N availabilities as a result of natural selection in their respective habitats. We conclude that an adaptive differentiation has occurred between the two ecotypes and plasticity in the biomass allocation is directly related to its optimization in changing environments.
在山区,植物分布受到各种环境胁迫的限制。植物功能性状的可塑性和稳定性可能与各自栖息地的最优策略以及沿海拔的生态型分化有关。尽管植物生物量分配已被广泛研究与沿海拔对土壤养分有效性的适应性相关,但对其最优性仍知之甚少。我们在野外研究了土壤养分有效性,并对在不同养分有效性条件下生长的两种海拔生态型的拟南芥进行了生长分析。我们确定了形态和生理性状的可塑性,并使用最优性模型评估了最优生物量分配。我们的野外调查表明,土壤氮(N)有效性随海拔升高而增加而非降低。我们的生长分析表明,低地生态型在形态变量和氮浓度方面更具可塑性,而高地生态型在其他生理变量如净同化率(NAR)方面更具可塑性。低地生态型的叶质量比(LMR)在整个氮有效性范围内具有适度的可塑性,而高地生态型的LMR仅在较高氮有效性时具有很高的可塑性。最优性模型表明,低地生态型的LMR在研究的氮有效性范围内几乎是最优的,而高地生态型的LMR在低氮有效性时是次优的。这些结果表明,高地生态型仅适应高氮有效性,而低地生态型由于在各自栖息地的自然选择而适应相对较宽的氮有效性范围。我们得出结论,两种生态型之间发生了适应性分化,生物量分配的可塑性与其在变化环境中的优化直接相关。