de Jensen C Estévez, Harmon C L, Vitoreli A
University of Puerto Rico, Crops and Agro-Environmental Sciences, Plant Disease Clinic at Juana Diaz, PR.
University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Plant Pathology Department, Plant Diagnostic Center, Gainesville, FL.
Plant Dis. 2013 Oct;97(10):1378. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-13-0108-PDN.
Sentinel plots for monitoring Asian soybean rust (ASR) caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. were initiated in 2005 at Isabela (EEI), Adjuntas (EEA), and Juana Diaz (EEJD) experiment stations. Until 2009, no signs or symptoms of ASR were observed in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) or common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). These sites were found to be negative for the occurrence of ASR based on PCR with specific primers Ppa1 and Ppa2 (2). However, P. meibomiae, the cause of American soybean rust (AmSR) endemic to this region, was found in Adjuntas naturally infecting numerous wild and cultivated legumes, particularly Lablab purpureus (3). Symptoms of AmSR in L. purpureus appeared as reddish-brown spots on the underside of the leaves with three to four uredia per lesion. On February 12, 2011, leaf samples of soybean in beginning pod-fill (R5) and beginning-maturity (R8) growth stages were collected in a winter nursery at EEI and found to have small brown specks with chlorotic haloes on the underside of the leaves and leaf sections from symptomatic areas indicated an abundance of uredinia. Under the light microscope, urediniospores observed at 40× were morphologically similar to Phakopsora spp. Total DNA was extracted from leaf discs using the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit following the methods of Frederick et al. (2). Detection of ASR pathogen was achieved via PCR amplification with Ppa1 and Ppa2 primers that are specific for P. pachyrhizi Syd. After sequencing the amplicon, BLAST analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal RNA genes indicated 100% identity with known P. pachyrhizi sequences in GenBank. The sequence of isolate P. pachyrhizi EEI-2011 was submitted to GenBank as JX994293. No amplification was observed after PCR with species-specific primers Pme1 and Pme2 specific for P. meibomiae (Arthur) Arthur. L. purpureus collected from EEA and Utuado only appears to be infected by P. meibomiae and no mixed infections with P. pachyrhizi were apparent, based on the PCR test. Leaf samples from EEI were sent to the UF Plant Diagnostic Center in Gainesville, FL, where quantitative PCR with primers Ppa1 and Ppa2 confirmed the presence of P. pachyrhizi; while P. meibomiae was not detected with primers Pme1 and Pme2. Pathogenicity tests were conducted on the soybean cv. Williams with isolate EEI-2011. Fifteen-day-old soybean plants were inoculated by attaching an infected and sporulating 1 cm piece of soybean leaf from EEI-2011 with an average of 4.5 × 10 urediniospores per cm (1). Inoculated plants were placed in a growth chamber at 20°C night and 28°C day temperatures, 80% humidity, and a 12-h light photoperiod. Small reddish brown spots with chlorotic haloes developed 4 to 6 days after inoculation and tan lesions appeared 10 to 15 days later. Mature tan lesions developed in 2 weeks with an average of 2.4 uredinia/lesion. Urediniospores were observed with light microscope and these were morphologically similar to those spores observed in the original diseased samples. Another PCR test confirmed P. pachyrhizi after amplification with the species-specific primers. The pathogenicity test was repeated twice with the same cultivar. To our knowledge, this is the first report of ASR in Puerto Rico and this finding will have implications as another overwintering site for Asian soybean rust in the Caribbean region. References: (1) C. Estévez de Jensen et al. J. Agric. Univ. P.R. 93:125, 2009. (2) R. D. Frederick et al. Phytopathology 92:217, 2002. (3) B. Vega and C. Estévez de Jensen. J. Agric. Univ. P.R. 94:211, 2010.
2005年,在伊莎贝拉(EEI)、阿德洪塔斯(EEA)和胡安娜·迪亚兹(EEJD)试验站启动了用于监测由大豆锈菌(Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd.)引起的亚洲大豆锈病(ASR)的监测点。直到2009年,在大豆(Glycine max [L.] Merr.)或菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)中均未观察到ASR的任何迹象或症状。基于使用特异性引物Ppa1和Ppa2进行的PCR检测,发现这些地点不存在ASR(2)。然而,在阿德洪塔斯发现了该地区特有的美洲大豆锈病(AmSR)的病原菌美澳型双胞锈菌(P. meibomiae),它自然感染了许多野生和栽培豆科植物,尤其是紫花豆(Lablab purpureus)(3)。紫花豆上AmSR的症状表现为叶片下表面出现红棕色斑点,每个病斑有三到四个夏孢子堆。2011年2月12日,在EEI的冬季苗圃中采集了处于豆荚充实初期(R5)和成熟初期(R8)生长阶段的大豆叶片样本,发现叶片下表面有带褪绿晕圈的小褐色斑点,有症状区域的叶片切片显示有大量夏孢子堆。在光学显微镜下,40倍放大观察到的夏孢子在形态上与双胞锈菌属(Phakopsora spp.)相似。按照弗雷德里克等人(2)的方法,使用Qiagen DNeasy植物微量提取试剂盒从叶盘提取总DNA。通过使用对大豆锈菌(P. pachyrhizi Syd.)特异的Ppa1和Ppa2引物进行PCR扩增来检测ASR病原菌。对扩增产物进行测序后,核糖体RNA基因内部转录间隔区(ITS)区域的BLAST分析表明与GenBank中已知的大豆锈菌序列有100%的同一性。大豆锈菌分离株EEI - 2011的序列已作为JX994293提交至GenBank。使用对美澳型双胞锈菌(P. meibomiae (Arthur) Arthur)特异的种特异性引物Pme1和Pme2进行PCR后未观察到扩增。基于PCR检测,从EEA和乌图阿多采集的紫花豆似乎仅被美澳型双胞锈菌感染,未发现与大豆锈菌的混合感染。来自EEI的叶片样本被送往佛罗里达州盖恩斯维尔的佛罗里达大学植物诊断中心,使用引物Ppa1和Ppa2进行的定量PCR证实了大豆锈菌的存在;而使用引物Pme1和Pme2未检测到美澳型双胞锈菌。使用分离株EEI - 2011对大豆品种威廉姆斯进行了致病性测试。用来自EEI - 2011的一块感染并产孢的1厘米大豆叶片附着在15日龄的大豆植株上进行接种,每厘米平均有4.5×10个夏孢子(1)。将接种的植株置于生长室中,夜间温度20°C,白天温度28°C,湿度80%,光照周期12小时。接种后4至6天出现带褪绿晕圈的小红褐色斑点,10至15天后出现黄褐色病斑。2周内形成成熟的黄褐色病斑,每个病斑平均有2.4个夏孢子堆。用光学显微镜观察到夏孢子,其在形态上与原始病样中观察到的孢子相似。用种特异性引物扩增后进行的另一次PCR检测证实了大豆锈菌的存在。对同一品种重复进行了两次致病性测试。据我们所知,这是波多黎各ASR的首次报道,这一发现将意味着加勒比地区是亚洲大豆锈病的另一个越冬地点。参考文献:(1)C. Estévez de Jensen等人,《波多黎各农业大学学报》93:125,2009年。(2)R. D. Frederick等人,《植物病理学》92:217,2002年。(3)B. Vega和C. Estévez de Jensen,《波多黎各农业大学学报》94:211,2010年。