Zachar P, Krueger R F, Kendler K S
Department of Psychology,Auburn University Montgomery,Montgomery,AL,USA.
Department of Psychology,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis, MN,USA.
Psychol Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001543. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
As the revision process leading to DSM-5 began, the domain of personality disorder embodied the highest aspirations for major change. After an initial prototype-based proposal failed to gain acceptance, the Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group (P&PDWG) developed a hybrid model containing categorical and dimensional components. A clash of perspectives both within the P&PDWG and between the P&PDWG and DSM-5 oversight committees led to the rejection of this proposal from the main body of DSM-5. Major issues included conflicting ways of conceptualizing validation, differences of opinion from personality disorder experts outside the P&PDWG, divergent concepts of the magnitude of evidence needed to support substantial changes, and the disagreements about clinical utility of the hybrid model. Despite these setbacks, the 'Alternative DSM-5 Model of Personality Disorder' is presented in Section III of the DSM-5. Further research should clarify its performance relative to the DSM-IV criteria reprinted in the main DSM-5 text.
在导致《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)的修订过程开始时,人格障碍领域承载着重大变革的最高期望。在基于初始原型的提案未获认可后,人格与人格障碍工作组(P&PDWG)制定了一个包含分类和维度成分的混合模型。P&PDWG内部以及P&PDWG与DSM - 5监督委员会之间的观点冲突导致该提案被DSM - 5主体部分否决。主要问题包括概念化验证的相互冲突方式、P&PDWG之外的人格障碍专家的意见分歧、支持重大变革所需证据量的不同概念,以及关于混合模型临床效用的分歧。尽管遭遇了这些挫折,DSM - 5的第三部分仍呈现了“人格障碍的替代DSM - 5模型”。进一步的研究应阐明其相对于重印在DSM - 5正文主要部分的DSM - IV标准的表现。