• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在需要急性重症监护的患者的院前治疗中,医生的影响是什么?——系统评价综述。

What is the impact of physicians in prehospital treatment for patients in need of acute critical care? - An overview of reviews.

机构信息

DEFACTUM,Department of Public Health and Health Services Research.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):27-35. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318003616. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462318003616
PMID:30722802
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this overview was to systematically identify and synthesize existing evidence from systematic reviews on the impact of prehospital physician involvement.

METHODS

The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched from 1 January 2000 to 17 November 2017. We included systematic reviews comparing physician-based with non-physician-based prehospital treatment in patients with one of five critical conditions requiring a rapid response.

RESULTS

Ten reviews published from 2009 to 2017 were included. Physician treatment was associated with increased survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and patients with severe trauma; in the latter group, the result was based on more limited evidence. The success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) has improved over the years, but ETI by physicians is still associated with higher success rates than intubation by paramedics. In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, intubation by paramedics who were not well skilled to do so markedly increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is hinting at a benefit of physicians in selected aspects of prehospital emergency services, including treatment of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and critically ill or injured patients in need of prehospital intubation. Evidence is, however, limited by confounding and bias, and comparison is hampered by differences in case mix and the organization of emergency medical services. Future research should strive to design studies that enable appropriate control of baseline confounding and obtain follow-up data for the proportion of patients who die in the prehospital setting.

摘要

目的

本综述旨在系统地识别和综合现有系统评价中关于院前医生参与的影响的证据。

方法

从 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 11 月 17 日,检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆。我们纳入了比较基于医生和非医生的院前治疗对五种需要快速反应的危急情况患者的系统评价。

结果

纳入了 2009 年至 2017 年发表的 10 篇综述。在院外心脏骤停和严重创伤患者中,医生治疗与生存率的提高相关;在后一组中,结果基于更有限的证据。多年来,院前气管插管(ETI)的成功率有所提高,但医生进行 ETI 的成功率仍高于护理人员。在严重创伤性脑损伤患者中,技能不熟练的护理人员进行插管明显增加了死亡率。

结论

目前的证据暗示医生在院前急救服务的某些方面有益,包括治疗院外心脏骤停患者和需要院前插管的危重病或受伤患者。然而,证据受到混杂和偏倚的限制,并且由于病例组合和急诊医疗服务组织的差异,比较受到阻碍。未来的研究应努力设计能够适当控制基线混杂并获得在院前环境中死亡的患者比例的随访数据的研究。

相似文献

1
What is the impact of physicians in prehospital treatment for patients in need of acute critical care? - An overview of reviews.在需要急性重症监护的患者的院前治疗中,医生的影响是什么?——系统评价综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):27-35. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318003616. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
Critical care paramedics: where is the evidence? A systematic review.重症护理急救人员:证据何在?一项系统综述。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Dec;31(12):1016-24. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202721. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
3
Analysis of prehospital endotracheal intubation performed by emergency physicians: retrospective survey of a single emergency medical center in Japan.分析急诊医师在院前进行的气管插管:日本单一急救医疗中心的回顾性调查。
J Anesth. 2013 Jun;27(3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1528-x. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
4
Emergency intubation for acutely ill and injured patients.急危重症患者的紧急气管插管术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD001429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001429.pub2.
5
Experience in Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation Significantly Influences Mortality of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.院前气管插管经验对重度创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率有显著影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0141034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141034. eCollection 2015.
6
Prehospital rapid sequence intubation for head trauma: conditions for a successful program.头部创伤的院前快速顺序插管:成功方案的条件
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):997-1001. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000217285.94057.5e.
7
Efficacy of the presence of an emergency physician in prehospital major trauma care: A nationwide cohort study in Japan.急诊医师在院前重大创伤救护中的效能:日本全国队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;37(9):1605-1610. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
8
Prehospital oral endotracheal intubation by rural basic emergency medical technicians.农村基层急救医疗技术人员进行的院前经口气管插管
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;32(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70095-2.
9
Prehospital endotracheal intubation of children by paramedics.护理人员对儿童进行院前气管插管。
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Jul;28(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70136-1.
10
Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation experience, confidence and confidence-associated factors among Northern Japanese emergency life-saving technicians: a population-based cross-sectional study.日本北部紧急救生技术人员的院外气管插管经验、信心及信心相关因素:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 13;8(7):e021858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021858.

引用本文的文献

1
Prehospital blood gas analyses in acute patients treated by a ground-based physician-manned emergency unit: a cohort study.院前血气分析在由地勤医生人员组成的紧急救援单元治疗的急性病患者中的应用:一项队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Dec 19;31(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01170-1.
2
Transport of the patient with trauma: a narrative review.创伤患者的转运:叙述性综述。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Nov;77(11):1281-1287. doi: 10.1111/anae.15812. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
The Effect of Physician-Led Enhanced Care Teams in Prehospital Trauma Resuscitation.
医生主导的强化护理团队在院前创伤复苏中的作用。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 12;12(9):e10405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10405.
4
Identification of Serious Adverse Events in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries, from Prehospital Care to Intensive-Care Unit, Using Early Warning Scores.使用早期预警评分识别创伤性脑损伤患者从院前急救到重症监护病房的严重不良事件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051504.