Suppr超能文献

踏步和跑步时的通气需求:对儿童运动性支气管收缩的影响。

Ventilatory Demand During Stepping and Running: Implications for Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Children.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, Brazil.

Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2019 Apr;64(4):445-452. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06363. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-step tests have been proposed as simple and inexpensive challenges to diagnose exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in the pediatric population. Work performed and the resulting ventilation, however, might be substantially lower in stepping than running. This might decrease the diagnostic yield of step-based challenges.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 53 children with asthma with exercise-related symptoms (34 boys, age 6-18 y) underwent an incremental stepping test, a 6-min constant stepping test, and a treadmill running test on different days.

RESULTS

Constant and incremental stepping tests presented with lower metabolic demands (V̇ 1.42 ± 0.48 and 1.34 ± 0.55 L/min, respectively), ventilatory demands (V̇ 45 ± 14 and 43 ± 16 L/min, respectively), and cardiovascular demands (160 ± 20 and 161 ± 19 beats/min, respectively) than the treadmill running test (1.65 ± 0.60 L/min, 54 ± 17 L/min, and 172 ± 7 beats/min, respectively) ( < .05). Between-test agreement in diagnosing EIB was poor (kappa 0.217-0.361). Although EIB prevalence was higher after the treadmill running test (60%) compared to constant (53%) and incremental (47%) stepping tests, 7 subjects developed EIB only in stepping. Clinical and resting functional characteristics did not differ in discordant subjects (ie, EIB negative in a given test but positive in another) versus concordant subjects (ie, EIB negative or positive in both tests). EIB was not related to individual test ability in eliciting high to very-high ventilation (≥ 40% or ≥ 60% maximum voluntary ventilation, respectively). Moreover, a negative stepping test but a positive treadmill test (and vice versa) was not associated with greater ventilatory demands.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower prevalence of EIB in stepping compared to treadmill running is not related to less ventilation demand in the former modality. Although stepping might be useful as a screening EIB test due its portability and low cost, a negative test should be confirmed with a running-based test in symptomatic children.

摘要

背景

单步测试已被提议作为一种简单且廉价的方法来诊断小儿运动性支气管收缩(EIB)。然而,与跑步相比,踏步时的工作强度和产生的通气量可能要低得多。这可能会降低基于踏步的测试的诊断效果。

方法

在一项横断面研究中,53 名有运动相关症状的哮喘儿童(34 名男孩,年龄 6-18 岁)在不同的日子里进行了递增踏步测试、6 分钟恒速踏步测试和跑步机跑步测试。

结果

恒速和递增踏步测试的代谢需求(分别为 1.42±0.48 和 1.34±0.55 L/min)、通气需求(分别为 45±14 和 43±16 L/min)和心血管需求(分别为 160±20 和 161±19 次/分钟)均低于跑步机跑步测试(分别为 1.65±0.60 L/min、54±17 L/min 和 172±7 次/分钟)(<0.05)。诊断 EIB 的测试间一致性较差(kappa 值为 0.217-0.361)。虽然跑步机跑步测试后 EIB 的患病率(60%)高于恒速(53%)和递增(47%)踏步测试,但 7 名受试者仅在踏步时出现 EIB。在不一致的受试者(即在给定的测试中 EIB 为阴性,但在另一个测试中为阳性)与一致的受试者(即 EIB 在两个测试中均为阴性或阳性)之间,临床和静息功能特征没有差异。EIB 与诱发高至极高通气(分别为≥40%或≥60%最大自主通气)的个体测试能力无关。此外,踏步测试为阴性而跑步机测试为阳性(反之亦然)与更高的通气需求无关。

结论

与跑步机跑步相比,踏步时 EIB 的患病率较低与前者模式下的通气需求较低无关。虽然由于便携性和低成本,踏步可能是一种有用的 EIB 筛查测试,但在有症状的儿童中,阴性测试应通过基于跑步的测试来确认。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验