Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio.
Respir Care. 2019 Jan;64(1):71-76. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06283. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
A simple exercise test to evaluate for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is routinely ordered in pediatric patients with exercise-induced dyspnea. However, the utility of this test in establishing the cause of exercise-induced dyspnea is not thoroughly examined in the pediatric population. We sought to assess the efficiency of a simple EIB challenge test in finding the cause of exercise-induced dyspnea in pediatric patients referred to our tertiary center in the last 5 y.
We performed a retrospective chart review for all of these exercise tests done at Akron Children's Hospital from March 2011 to March 2016. Patients with chronic conditions (eg, cystic fibrosis, cardiac abnormality) were excluded. Demographics, clinical diagnosis of asthma, a presumptive diagnosis of exercise-induced asthma or EIB by the referring provider, symptoms with and without exercise, albuterol use, spirometry, and simple EIB challenge test results were collected. The chi-square test of independence was utilized in the examination of potential dependent relationships between categorical variables. A value < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Out of 164 enrolled subjects (57 males; age 6-20 y), only 19% showed evidence of EIB. There were no significant associations between EIB status (ie, EIB-positive or EIB-negative) based on exercise testing and gender, typical symptoms of EIB, diagnosis of exercise-induced asthma or EIB, and albuterol use ( > .05). However, a subject without asthma was 2.8 times more likely to have negative exercise test for EIB (odds ratio 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.5); in addition, approximately 85% of tests in subjects without asthma were negative.
In a majority of subjects without asthma, a simple EIB challenge testing failed to uncover the cause of exercise-induced dyspnea and thus was inefficient. In these subjects, cardiopulmonary exercise testing may be more useful and cost-effective to explore other causes of dyspnea including EIB.
在有运动诱发呼吸困难的小儿患者中,常规进行简单的运动试验来评估运动诱发的支气管收缩(EIB)。然而,在儿科人群中,尚未彻底检查该试验在确定运动诱发呼吸困难原因方面的效用。我们试图评估在过去 5 年中在我们的三级中心进行的简单 EIB 激发试验在发现小儿患者运动诱发呼吸困难原因方面的效率。
我们对 2011 年 3 月至 2016 年 3 月阿克伦儿童医院进行的所有这些运动试验进行了回顾性图表审查。排除患有慢性疾病(例如囊性纤维化,心脏异常)的患者。收集了人口统计学资料,哮喘的临床诊断,参考提供者对运动诱发哮喘或 EIB 的推测诊断,有无运动时的症状,沙丁胺醇的使用,肺活量测定和简单的 EIB 激发试验结果。在检查分类变量之间潜在的依赖关系时,使用独立性卡方检验。 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
在 164 名入组患者中(男性 57 名;年龄 6-20 岁),仅 19%的患者存在 EIB 的证据。根据运动试验,EIB 状态(即 EIB 阳性或 EIB 阴性)与性别,EIB 的典型症状,运动诱发哮喘或 EIB 的诊断以及沙丁胺醇的使用均无明显关联(>0.05)。但是,没有哮喘的患者进行 EIB 阴性运动测试的可能性是阴性的两倍(优势比 2.8,95%CI 1.3-6.5);此外,大约 85%的无哮喘患者的测试结果为阴性。
在大多数无哮喘的患者中,简单的 EIB 激发试验未能发现运动诱发呼吸困难的原因,因此效率低下。在这些患者中,心肺运动测试可能更有用且更具成本效益,可以探索其他导致呼吸困难的原因,包括 EIB。