Concha Astrid R, Guest Claire M, Harris Rob, Pike Thomas W, Feugier Alexandre, Zulch Helen, Mills Daniel S
Animal Scent Detection Consultancy and Research, Santiago, Chile.
School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jan 22;5:345. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00345. eCollection 2018.
Dogs' abilities to respond to concentrations of odorant molecules are generally deemed superior to electronic sensors. This sensitivity has been used traditionally in many areas; but is a more recent innovation within the medical field. As a bio-detection sensor for human diseases such as cancer and infections, dogs often need to detect volatile organic compounds in bodily fluids such as urine and blood. Although the limits of olfactory sensitivity in dogs have been studied since the 1960s, there is a gap in our knowledge concerning these limits in relation to the concentration of odorants presented in a fluid phase. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate olfactory detection thresholds to an inert substance, amyl acetate presented in a liquid phase. Ten dogs were trained in a "Go/No go" single scent-detection task using an eight-choice carousel apparatus. They were trained to respond to the presence of solutions of amyl acetate diluted to varying degrees in mineral oil by sitting in front of the positive sample, and not responding to the 7 other control samples. Training and testing took place in an indoor room with the same handler throughout using a food reward. After 30 weeks of training, using a forward chaining technique, dogs were tested for their sensitivity. The handler did not assist the dog during the search and was blind to the concentration of amyl acetate tested and the position of the target in the carousel. The global olfactory threshold trend for each dog was estimated by fitting a least-squares logistic curve to the association between the proportion of true positives and amyl acetate concentration. Results show an olfactory detection threshold for fluid mixtures ranging from 40 parts per billion to 1.5 parts per trillion. There was considerable inter-dog difference in sensitivity, even though all dogs were trained in the same way and worked without the assistance of the handler. This variation highlights factors to be considered in future work assessing olfactory detection performance by dogs.
狗对气味分子浓度的反应能力通常被认为优于电子传感器。这种敏感性传统上已在许多领域得到应用;但在医学领域却是一项较新的创新。作为检测癌症和感染等人类疾病的生物检测传感器,狗常常需要检测尿液和血液等体液中的挥发性有机化合物。尽管自20世纪60年代以来就对狗的嗅觉敏感性极限进行了研究,但就液相中呈现的气味剂浓度而言,我们在这方面的知识仍存在空白。因此,本研究的目的是估计狗对液相中呈现的惰性物质乙酸戊酯的嗅觉检测阈值。使用八选一旋转木马装置,对10只狗进行了“是/否”单一气味检测任务的训练。训练它们通过坐在阳性样本前,对在矿物油中稀释到不同程度的乙酸戊酯溶液做出反应,而不对其他7个对照样本做出反应。训练和测试在一个室内房间进行,全程由同一训练员使用食物奖励。经过30周的训练,采用正向连锁技术对狗的敏感性进行测试。在搜索过程中,训练员不协助狗,并且对所测试的乙酸戊酯浓度以及目标在旋转木马中的位置不知情。通过将真阳性比例与乙酸戊酯浓度之间的关联拟合为最小二乘逻辑曲线,估计每只狗的整体嗅觉阈值趋势。结果显示,液体混合物的嗅觉检测阈值范围为十亿分之40至万亿分之1.5。尽管所有狗都以相同方式训练且在没有训练员协助的情况下工作,但狗之间的敏感性仍存在相当大的差异。这种变化凸显了未来评估狗的嗅觉检测性能的工作中需要考虑的因素。