• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量阴道米索前列醇与阴道地诺前列酮栓用于 41 周后引产:一项随机试验。

Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.

机构信息

Unit of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):913-919. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13556. Epub 2019 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.13556
PMID:30723912
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a low-dose protocol of vaginal misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor in women with post-term pregnancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We designed a prospective, randomized, open-labeled trial with evaluators blinded to the end-point, including women of at least 41 weeks of gestational age with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies and a Bishop score <6. They were randomized into dinoprostone or misoprostol groups in a 1:1 ratio. Baseline maternal data and perinatal outcomes were recorded for statistical analysis. Successful vaginal delivery within 24 hours was the primary outcome variable. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (number NTC03744364).

RESULTS

We included 198 women for analysis (99 women in each group). Vaginal birth rate within 24 hours did not differ between groups (49.5% vs 42.4%; P = 0.412). When the Bishop score was <4, dinoprostone insert showed a higher probability of vaginal delivery within 12 hours (17.8% vs 4%; P = 0.012). In the dinoprostone group, removal of the insert was more likely to be due to an adverse event (5.1% vs 14.1%; P = 0.051) and an abnormal fetal heart rate pattern during active labor (44.4% vs 58.6%; P = 0.047). Both groups were similar in neonatal outcomes including Apgar score, umbilical cord pH and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose vaginal misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone insert seem to be equally effective and safe for induction of labor in pregnant women with a gestational age beyond 41 weeks.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较小剂量阴道米索前列醇和阴道地诺前列酮栓用于足月妊娠引产的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

我们设计了一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验,评估者对终点设盲,纳入至少 41 孕周、单胎妊娠、Bishop 评分<6 的孕妇。按 1:1 比例随机分为地诺前列酮或米索前列醇组。记录基线产妇数据和围产结局进行统计学分析。24 小时内阴道分娩成功为主要结局变量。P 值<0.05 认为具有统计学意义。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(编号 NTC03744364)。

结果

我们纳入了 198 名孕妇进行分析(每组 99 名)。两组 24 小时内阴道分娩率无差异(49.5%比 42.4%;P=0.412)。当 Bishop 评分<4 分时,地诺前列酮栓在 12 小时内阴道分娩的可能性更高(17.8%比 4%;P=0.012)。地诺前列酮组中,因不良事件(5.1%比 14.1%;P=0.051)和活跃期胎心异常(44.4%比 58.6%;P=0.047)取出栓的可能性更大。两组新生儿结局包括 Apgar 评分、脐动脉 pH 值和新生儿重症监护室入院率均相似。

结论

对于 41 周以上妊娠的孕妇,小剂量阴道米索前列醇和阴道地诺前列酮栓用于引产似乎同样有效且安全。

相似文献

1
Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.低剂量阴道米索前列醇与阴道地诺前列酮栓用于 41 周后引产:一项随机试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):913-919. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13556. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.足月引产时阴道用米索前列醇与地诺前列酮阴道栓剂的疗效及安全性比较:一项随机试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
3
Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.米索前列醇与地诺前列酮用于引产术前宫颈成熟和引产的随机对照比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 1997 May;96(5):366-9.
4
Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.米索前列醇阴道栓剂与地诺前列酮阴道栓剂用于引产的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Oct;98(10):1268-1273. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13667. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.足月妊娠引产中滴定口服米索前列醇溶液与阴道用地诺前列酮的对比研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;294(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-4000-y. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
6
Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.米索前列醇阴道给药与地诺前列酮阴道栓剂用于引产的随机对照试验
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Apr;13(4):254-9. doi: 10.1080/jmf.13.4.254.259.
7
Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.足月经阴道米索前列醇或前列腺素 E2 栓剂引产:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):542.e1-542.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.226. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.米索前列醇用于足月引产:一种比地诺前列酮阴道凝胶更有效的药物。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;106(8):793-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08399.x.
9
A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.米索前列醇间断阴道给药与地诺前列酮持续给药用于促宫颈成熟和引产的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;177(3):612-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70154-6.
10
Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.小时滴定口服米索前列醇与阴道地诺前列酮用于引产的随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):56.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.033. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for labor induction at term: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.米索前列醇与地诺前列酮用于足月引产的疗效和安全性比较:随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 9;11:1459793. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1459793. eCollection 2024.
2
Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Women with Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Prospective Study.地诺前列酮阴道栓剂用于低危妊娠妇女引产的前瞻性研究。
Med Arch. 2022 Feb;76(1):39-44. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2022.76.39-44.
3
Labor induction with prostaglandin E versus E: a comparison of outcomes.
前列腺素 E 与 E2 引产的效果比较。
J Perinatol. 2021 Apr;41(4):726-735. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00888-5. Epub 2020 Dec 7.