Suppr超能文献

社区居住的痴呆症患者的疼痛评估和疼痛治疗:系统评价和叙述性综合。

Pain assessment and pain treatment for community-dwelling people with dementia: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

机构信息

Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.

Family Medicine and Primary Care, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technical University, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;34(6):807-821. doi: 10.1002/gps.5078. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the current literature on pain assessment and pain treatment for community-dwelling people with dementia.

METHOD

A comprehensive systematic search of the literature with narrative synthesis was conducted. Eight major bibliographic databases were searched in October 2018. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were sequentially screened. Standardised data extraction and quality appraisal exercises were conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were included in the review, 11 reporting findings on pain assessment tools or methods and 27 reporting findings on treatments for pain. In regard to pain assessment, a large proportion of people with moderate to severe dementia were unable to complete a self-report pain instrument. Pain was more commonly reported by informal caregivers than the person with dementia themselves. Limited evidence was available for pain-focused behavioural observation assessment. In regard to pain treatment, paracetamol use was more common in community-dwelling people with dementia compared with people without dementia. However, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were used less. For stronger analgesics, community-dwelling people with dementia were more likely to receive strong opioids (eg, fentanyl) than people without dementia.

CONCLUSION

This review identifies a dearth of high-quality studies exploring pain assessment and/or treatment for community-dwelling people with dementia, not least into non-pharmacological interventions. The consequences of this lack of evidence, given the current and projected prevalence of the disease, are very serious and require urgent redress. In the meantime, clinicians should adopt a patient- and caregiver-centred, multi-dimensional, longitudinal approach to pain assessment and pain treatment for this population.

摘要

目的

描述社区居住的痴呆症患者的疼痛评估和治疗的当前文献。

方法

对文献进行全面的系统检索,结合叙述性综合分析。2018 年 10 月,我们对 8 个主要的文献数据库进行了搜索。依次筛选标题、摘要和全文文章。进行标准化的数据提取和质量评估练习。

结果

综述共纳入 32 项研究,其中 11 项报告了疼痛评估工具或方法的发现,27 项报告了疼痛治疗的发现。在疼痛评估方面,相当一部分中重度痴呆患者无法完成自我报告的疼痛仪器。非正式照顾者比痴呆症患者本人更常报告疼痛。有限的证据可用于以疼痛为重点的行为观察评估。在疼痛治疗方面,与没有痴呆症的人相比,社区居住的痴呆症患者更常使用扑热息痛。然而,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的使用较少。对于更强的镇痛药,与没有痴呆症的人相比,社区居住的痴呆症患者更有可能接受强阿片类药物(如芬太尼)。

结论

本综述确定了缺乏高质量的研究来探索社区居住的痴呆症患者的疼痛评估和/或治疗,尤其是缺乏非药物干预的研究。鉴于该疾病的当前和预计流行率,这种证据不足的后果非常严重,需要紧急纠正。在此期间,临床医生应采取以患者和照顾者为中心、多维度、纵向的方法对该人群进行疼痛评估和疼痛治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验