de la Madrid Rafael, Garza Fabian, Kirk Justin, Luong Huy, Snowden Levi, Taylor Jonathan, Vizena Benjamin
Department of Physics , Lamar University , Beaumont , Texas 77710 , United States.
Langmuir. 2019 Feb 19;35(7):2871-2877. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03780. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
We compare the lateral retention forces on sessile drops (which are drops that are placed on top of a solid surface), pendant drops (which are drops that are placed on the underside of the surface), and inverted sessile drops (which are drops that are first placed on top and then on the underside of the surface by flipping the surface). We have found experimentally that the retention force on a truly pendant drop is always smaller than that on a sessile drop. However, the retention force on an inverted sessile drop is comparable to, and usually larger than, that on a sessile drop. Thus, the retention force on a drop depends not only on whether it is placed on top or on bottom of a surface, but also on the history of drop deposition, since such history affects the width, the shape, and the contact angles of the drop.
我们比较了固定液滴(放置在固体表面顶部的液滴)、悬垂液滴(放置在表面下方的液滴)和倒置固定液滴(先放置在顶部,然后通过翻转表面放置在底部的液滴)的侧向保持力。我们通过实验发现,真正的悬垂液滴上的保持力总是小于固定液滴上的保持力。然而,倒置固定液滴上的保持力与固定液滴上的保持力相当,并且通常更大。因此,液滴上的保持力不仅取决于它是放置在表面的顶部还是底部,还取决于液滴沉积的历史,因为这种历史会影响液滴的宽度、形状和接触角。