Maenhout Annelies, Cornelis Elise, Van de Velde Dominique, Desmet Valerie, Gorus Ellen, Van Malderen Lien, Vanbosseghem Ruben, De Vriendt Patricia
Research Group Zorginnovatie, Artevelde University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Frailty in Ageing Research Group (FRIA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Apr;24(4):649-658. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1571014. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
This study aimed to investigate quality of life in nursing home residents and the relationship with personal, organizational, activity-related factors and social satisfaction. In a cross-sectional survey study in 73 nursing homes in Flanders, Belgium, 171 cognitively healthy residents were randomly recruited (mean age 85.40 years [±5.88]; 27% men, 73% women). Quality of life, as the dependent/response variable, was measured using anamnestic comparative self-assessment (range -5 to +5). Multiple linear regression (forward stepwise selection) was used (1) to investigate which factors were significantly related to nursing home residents' quality of life and (2) to model the relationship between the variables by fitting a linear equation to the observed data. Nursing home residents reported a quality of life score of 2.12 (±2.16). Mood, self-perceived health status, social satisfaction and educational level were withheld as significant predictors of the anamnestic comparative self-assessment score ( < 0.001), explaining 38.1% of the variance in quality of life. Results suggest that a higher quality of life in nursing homes can be pursued by strategies to prevent depression and to improve nursing home residents' subjective perception of health (e.g. offering good care) and social network. It is recommended that nursing homes prepare for future generations, who will be more educated.
本研究旨在调查养老院居民的生活质量,以及其与个人、组织、活动相关因素和社会满意度之间的关系。在比利时弗拉芒地区73家养老院开展的一项横断面调查研究中,随机招募了171名认知健康的居民(平均年龄85.40岁[±5.88];男性占27%,女性占73%)。作为因变量/响应变量的生活质量,采用回忆性比较自我评估法进行测量(范围为-5至+5)。使用多元线性回归(向前逐步选择法)(1) 调查哪些因素与养老院居民的生活质量显著相关,以及(2) 通过对观测数据拟合线性方程来建立变量之间的关系模型。养老院居民报告的生活质量得分为2.12(±2.16)。情绪、自我感知的健康状况、社会满意度和教育水平被确定为回忆性比较自我评估得分的显著预测因素(<0.001),解释了生活质量方差的38.1%。结果表明,可以通过预防抑郁、改善养老院居民对健康的主观认知(如提供优质护理)和社交网络等策略来追求更高的养老院生活质量。建议养老院为受教育程度更高的后代做好准备。