• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
International survey of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and their attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者及其对药物基因组学检测态度的国际调查。
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 Jun;29(4):76-83. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000368.
2
Multisite Investigation of Outcomes With Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.多中心研究:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后实施 CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
3
Clinical Outcomes and Sustainability of Using Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用基于基因型的抗血小板治疗的临床结果和可持续性。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Apr;11(4):e002069. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.002069.
4
Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后序贯氯吡格雷与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗对 PCI 患者心脑血管及出血事件的影响:STOPDAPT-2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145.
5
Study design and rationale for Optimal aNtiplatelet pharmacotherapy guided by bedSIDE genetic or functional TESTing in elective percutaneous coronary intervention patients (ONSIDE TEST): a prospective, open-label, randomised parallel-group multicentre trial (NCT01930773).择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者床边基因或功能检测指导下的最佳抗血小板药物治疗(ONSIDE TEST)的研究设计与原理:一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机平行组多中心试验(NCT01930773)
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(4):372-9. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0172. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Vitamin D levels and platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.糖尿病患者接受双联抗血小板治疗时的维生素 D 水平和血小板反应性。
Vascul Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;120:106564. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2019.106564. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
7
CYP2C19 LOF and GOF-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.CYP2C19功能缺失和功能增强指导下的急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗:一项成本效益分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017 Feb;31(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s10557-016-6705-y.
8
Short-term Safety and Mid-term Efficacy of Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的短期安全性和中期疗效
Intern Med. 2019 Aug 15;58(16):2315-2322. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2262-18. Epub 2019 May 22.
9
A randomised trial on platelet function-guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Rationale and design of the Testing Responsiveness to Platelet Inhibition on Chronic Antiplatelet Treatment for Acute Coronary Syndromes (TROPICAL-ACS) Trial.一项关于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者血小板功能引导下抗血小板治疗降阶梯的随机试验。急性冠状动脉综合征慢性抗血小板治疗中血小板抑制反应性测试(TROPICAL-ACS)试验的原理与设计。
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jan 5;117(1):188-195. doi: 10.1160/TH16-07-0557. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
Vitamin D Binding Protein rs7041 polymorphism and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.接受氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗患者的维生素D结合蛋白rs7041多态性与高残余血小板反应性
Vascul Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;93-95:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic Testing for Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.基因检测用于口服 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2024 Aug 6;150(6):e129-e150. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001257. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
Genetic-Guided Oral P2Y Inhibitor Selection and Cumulative Ischemic Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.基因指导的口服 P2Y 抑制剂选择与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的累积缺血事件。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):816-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.356.
3
Feasibility of Community Pharmacist-Initiated and Point-of-Care Genotype-Guided De-Escalation of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors.社区药师主导的基于基因型的即时降阶梯治疗口服 P2Y12 抑制剂的可行性。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Feb 25;14(3):578. doi: 10.3390/genes14030578.
4
Readiness to Accept Genetic Testing for Personalized Medicine: Survey Findings on the Role of Socio-Demographic Characteristics, Health Vulnerabilities, Perceived Genetic Risk and Personality Factors.接受个性化医疗基因检测的意愿:关于社会人口特征、健康脆弱性、感知遗传风险和人格因素作用的调查结果
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 3;12(11):1836. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111836.
5
Preferences for pharmacogenomic testing in polypharmacy patients: a discrete choice experiment.多药治疗患者对药物基因组检测的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Per Med. 2022 Nov;19(6):535-548. doi: 10.2217/pme-2022-0056. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
6
Public perceptions of pharmacogenomic services in Ireland - Are people with chronic disease more likely to want service availability than those without? A questionnaire study.爱尔兰公众对药物基因组学服务的看法——慢性病患者比非慢性病患者更希望获得该服务吗?一项问卷调查研究。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022 Sep 21;8:100182. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100182. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Pharmacogenetics of Antiplatelet Therapy.抗血小板治疗的药物遗传学。
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Jan 20;63:211-229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-051921-092701. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Experiences with Pharmacogenomic Testing among Patients and the General Public: Implications for Patient Counseling.患者及普通公众对药物基因组检测的态度与体验的范围综述:对患者咨询的启示
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):425. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030425.
9
Attitudes toward pharmacogenetics in patients undergoing testing following percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受检测的患者对药物遗传学的态度。
Per Med. 2022 Mar;19(2):93-101. doi: 10.2217/pme-2021-0064. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
A SNP involved in alternative splicing of is associated with clopidogrel resistance in coronary heart disease in Chinese population.一个与 选择性剪接相关的 SNP 与中国人群冠心病患者氯吡格雷抵抗相关。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Nov 20;12(24):25684-25699. doi: 10.18632/aging.104177.

本文引用的文献

1
Awareness and attitude of the public toward personalized medicine in Korea.韩国公众对个性化医学的认知和态度。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 16;13(2):e0192856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192856. eCollection 2018.
2
Multisite Investigation of Outcomes With Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.多中心研究:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后实施 CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
3
Effect of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing on Clinical Events and Anticoagulation Control Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: The GIFT Randomized Clinical Trial.基因型指导的华法林剂量调整对髋或膝关节置换术患者临床事件及抗凝控制的影响:GIFT随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Sep 26;318(12):1115-1124. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11469.
4
Clinicians' perceptions of pharmacogenomics use in psychiatry.临床医生对精神科药物基因组学应用的看法。
Pharmacogenomics. 2017 Apr;18(6):531-538. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2016-0164. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Participant-perceived understanding and perspectives on pharmacogenomics: the Mayo Clinic RIGHT protocol (Right Drug, Right Dose, Right Time).参与者对药物基因组学的理解和看法:梅奥诊所 RIGHT 方案(正确的药物、正确的剂量、正确的时间)。
Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):819-825. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.192. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
6
Patient Perceptions of Care as Influenced by a Large Institutional Pharmacogenomic Implementation Program.患者对大型机构药物基因组学实施计划所影响的护理的看法。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul;102(1):106-114. doi: 10.1002/cpt.586. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Genetic testing and personalized ovarian cancer screening: a survey of public attitudes.基因检测与个性化卵巢癌筛查:公众态度调查
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jul 26;16:46. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0325-3.
8
Clinical Implementation of Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics.心血管药物基因组学的临床应用
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Jun;90(6):701-4. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.011.
9
Genotype-based clinical trials in cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病中基于基因型的临床试验。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Aug;12(8):475-87. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.64. Epub 2015 May 5.
10
Pharmacogenetic-guided psychiatric intervention associated with increased adherence and cost savings.药物遗传学指导的精神科干预与依从性提高及成本节约相关。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 May;20(5):e146-56.

接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者及其对药物基因组学检测态度的国际调查。

International survey of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and their attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine.

Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

出版信息

Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 Jun;29(4):76-83. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000368.

DOI:10.1097/FPC.0000000000000368
PMID:30724853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6476684/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perceptions toward pharmacogenetic testing of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and whether geographical differences in these perceptions exist.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

TAILOR-PCI is the largest genotype-based cardiovascular clinical trial randomizing participants to conventional DAPT or prospective genotyping-guided DAPT. Enrolled patients completed surveys before and 6 months after randomization.

RESULTS

A total of 1327 patients completed baseline surveys of whom 28, 29, and 43% were from Korea, Canada and the USA, respectively. Most patients (77%) valued identifying pharmacogenetic variants; however, fewer Koreans (44%) as compared with Canadians (91%) and USA (89%) patients identified pharmacogenetics as being important (P<0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and country, those who were confident in their ability to understand genetic information were significantly more likely to value identifying pharmacogenetic variants (odds ratio: 30.0; 95% confidence interval: 20.5-43.8). Only 21% of Koreans, as opposed to 86 and 77% of patients in Canada and USA, respectively, were confident in their ability to understand genetic information (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although genetically mediated clopidogrel resistance is more prevalent amongst Asians, Koreans undergoing PCI identified pharmacogenetic variants as less important to their healthcare, likely related to their lack of confidence in their ability to understand genetic information. To enable successful implementation of pharmacogenetic testing on a global scale, the possibility of international population differences in perceptions should be considered.

摘要

目的

评估正在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的患者对药物遗传学检测的看法,以及这些看法是否存在地域差异。

参与者和方法

TAILOR-PCI 是一项最大的基于基因型的心血管临床试验,该试验将参与者随机分配至传统 DAPT 或前瞻性基因分型指导的 DAPT。入组患者在随机分组前后完成了调查。

结果

共有 1327 名患者完成了基线调查,其中 28%、29%和 43%分别来自韩国、加拿大和美国。大多数患者(77%)重视确定药物遗传学变异;然而,与加拿大(91%)和美国(89%)患者相比,韩国患者(44%)认为药物遗传学更重要(P<0.001)。在调整年龄、性别和国家后,那些对自己理解遗传信息的能力有信心的患者更有可能重视确定药物遗传学变异(优势比:30.0;95%置信区间:20.5-43.8)。只有 21%的韩国患者,而不是加拿大(86%)和美国(77%)的患者,对自己理解遗传信息的能力有信心(P<0.001)。

结论

尽管亚洲人群中氯吡格雷抵抗的遗传介导更为普遍,但接受 PCI 的韩国患者认为药物遗传学变异对其医疗保健的重要性较低,这可能与他们对理解遗传信息的能力缺乏信心有关。为了在全球范围内成功实施药物遗传学检测,应考虑国际人群在看法上的差异。