Allen Josiah D, Pittenger Amy L, Bishop Jeffrey R
Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Medigenics Consulting, LLC, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA.
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):425. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030425.
The use of pharmacogenomic (PGx) tests is increasing, but there are not standard approaches to counseling patients on their implications or results. To inform approaches for patient counseling, we conducted a scoping review of published literature on patient experiences with PGx testing and performed a thematic analysis of qualitative and quantitative reports. A structured scoping review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. The search identified 37 articles (involving = 6252 participants) published between 2010 and 2021 from a diverse range of populations and using a variety of study methodologies. Thematic analysis identified five themes (reasons for testing/perceived benefit, understanding of results, psychological response, impact of testing on patient/provider relationship, concerns about testing/perceived harm) and 22 subthemes. These results provide valuable context and potential areas of focus during patient counseling on PGx. Many of the knowledge gaps, misunderstandings, and concerns that participants identified could be mitigated by pre- and post-test counseling. More research is needed on patients' PGx literacy needs, along with the development of a standardized, open-source patient education curriculum and the development of validated PGx literacy assessment tools.
药物基因组学(PGx)检测的使用正在增加,但在就检测的意义或结果向患者提供咨询方面,尚无标准方法。为了为患者咨询方法提供信息,我们对已发表的关于患者PGx检测经历的文献进行了范围综述,并对定性和定量报告进行了主题分析。我们使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南进行了结构化范围综述。该检索确定了2010年至2021年间发表的37篇文章(涉及6252名参与者),这些文章来自不同人群,采用了多种研究方法。主题分析确定了五个主题(检测原因/感知益处、对结果的理解、心理反应、检测对患者/提供者关系的影响、对检测的担忧/感知危害)和22个子主题。这些结果为PGx患者咨询提供了有价值的背景信息和潜在关注领域。参与者所指出的许多知识差距、误解和担忧可以通过检测前和检测后的咨询来缓解。需要对患者的PGx知识素养需求进行更多研究,同时开发标准化的开源患者教育课程以及经过验证的PGx知识素养评估工具。