Yoon Jung Hyun, Kwak Jin Young, Moon Hee Jung, Kim Eun-Kyung
Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ultrasound Q. 2019 Sep;35(3):253-258. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000400.
In this study, we evaluated the role of ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy (US-CNB) in deciding upon management for prior atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) results. From May 2013 to June 2015, 149 thyroid nodules in 149 patients diagnosed as having AUS/FLUS were included. Of the 149 thyroid nodules, 86 (57.5%) had repeat US-guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA) and 63 (42.3%) had US-CNB. Histopathology results were divided according to various indications for diagnostic lobectomy, and rates of diagnosis that are candidates for diagnostic lobectomy were compared. Of the 149 thyroid nodules included, 86 (57.7%) were diagnosed as benign, 27 (18.1%) as malignancy, and 36 (24.2%) as inconclusive. Repeat US-FNA had significantly higher rates of inconclusive diagnosis compared with US-CNB, 33.7% to 11.1% (P = 0.003). Nodules with US-CNB had significantly higher rates of surgery or follow-up, whereas those with US-FNA had higher rates of repeated biopsy (P < 0.001). Rates of cytopathologic candidates for diagnostic lobectomy did not show significant differences between repeat US-FNA and US-CNB for any of the indications (all P > 0.05). Based on this, we concluded that US-CNB has higher diagnostic rates than did repeat US-FNA, but it does not provide superior guidance over repeat US-FNA in deciding upon diagnostic lobectomy for thyroid nodules with prior AUS/FLUS cytology results.
在本研究中,我们评估了超声引导下粗针穿刺活检(US-CNB)在决定对意义未明的非典型增生/意义未明的滤泡性病变(AUS/FLUS)结果进行处理中的作用。2013年5月至2015年6月,纳入了149例被诊断为AUS/FLUS的患者的149个甲状腺结节。在这149个甲状腺结节中,86个(57.5%)接受了重复超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸(US-FNA),63个(42.3%)接受了US-CNB。组织病理学结果根据诊断性叶切除术的各种指征进行分类,并比较了诊断性叶切除术候选者的诊断率。纳入的149个甲状腺结节中,86个(57.7%)被诊断为良性,27个(18.1%)为恶性,36个(24.2%)为不确定。与US-CNB相比,重复US-FNA的不确定诊断率显著更高,分别为33.7%和11.1%(P = 0.003)。接受US-CNB的结节进行手术或随访的比例显著更高,而接受US-FNA的结节重复活检的比例更高(P < 0.001)。对于任何指征,重复US-FNA和US-CNB之间诊断性叶切除术的细胞病理学候选者比例均未显示出显著差异(所有P > 0.05)。基于此,我们得出结论,US-CNB的诊断率高于重复US-FNA,但在决定对具有先前AUS/FLUS细胞学结果的甲状腺结节进行诊断性叶切除术时,它并不比重复US-FNA提供更好的指导。