• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速序列视觉呈现中刺激识别的语义重复盲和联想促进作用。

Semantic repetition blindness and associative facilitation in the identification of stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Brennan-MacCallum Building A18, Sydney, 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):1024-1030. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00905-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-019-00905-9
PMID:30725378
Abstract

Repetition blindness (RB) is the inability to detect both instances of a repeated stimulus during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). Prior work has demonstrated RB for semantically related critical items presented as pictures, but not for word stimuli. It is not known whether the type of semantic relationship between critical items (i.e., conceptual similarity or lexical association) determines the manifestation of semantically mediated RB, or how this is affected by the format of the stimuli. These questions provided the motivation for the present study. Participants reported items presented in picture or word RSVP streams in which critical items were either low-associate category coordinates (horse-camel), high-associate noncoordinates (horse-saddle), or unrelated word pairs (horse-umbrella). Report accuracy was reduced for category coordinate critical items only when they were presented in pictorial form; accuracy for coordinate word pairs did not differ from that of their unrelated counterparts. Associated critical items were reported more accurately than unrelated critical items in both the picture and word versions of the task. We suggest that semantic RB for pictorial stimuli results from intracategory interference in the visuosemantic space; words do not reliably suffer from semantic RB because they do not necessitate semantic mediation to be reported successfully. Conversely, the associative facilitation observed in both picture and word versions of the task reflects the spread of activation between the representations of associates in the lexical network.

摘要

重复盲视(RB)是指在快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)中无法检测到重复刺激的两个实例。先前的研究表明,在呈现图片形式的语义相关关键项目时会出现 RB,但在呈现词刺激时则不会。目前尚不清楚关键项目之间的语义关系类型(即概念相似性或词汇联想)是否决定了语义介导 RB 的表现,或者刺激的格式如何影响这种关系。这些问题为本次研究提供了动力。参与者报告了在图片或词 RSVP 流中呈现的项目,其中关键项目是低联想类别坐标(马-骆驼)、高联想非坐标(马-马鞍)或不相关的词对(马-伞)。只有当类别坐标关键项目以图片形式呈现时,报告的准确性才会降低;坐标词对的准确性与不相关词对的准确性没有差异。在任务的图片和词两种形式中,关联的关键项目比不相关的关键项目报告得更准确。我们认为,图片刺激的语义 RB 是由于视觉语义空间中的类别内干扰所致;词不会可靠地受到语义 RB 的影响,因为它们不需要语义中介即可成功报告。相反,在任务的图片和词两种形式中观察到的联想促进反映了词汇网络中联想表示之间的激活扩散。

相似文献

1
Semantic repetition blindness and associative facilitation in the identification of stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.快速序列视觉呈现中刺激识别的语义重复盲和联想促进作用。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):1024-1030. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00905-9.
2
The picture superiority effect in associative memory: A developmental study.联想记忆中的图片优势效应:一项发展研究。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;37(3):382-395. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12280. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.概念形成过程中的词汇因素:语义表征与其相应的语音和正字法词汇形式之间的关系。
Mem Cognit. 2016 May;44(4):519-37. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0576-5.
4
Repetition blindness for words and pictures: A failure to form stable type representations?词语和图片的重复盲视:无法形成稳定的类型表征?
Mem Cognit. 2021 Aug;49(6):1153-1162. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01146-5. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
5
Repetition blindness between visually different items: the case of pictures and words.视觉上不同项目之间的重复盲视:图片与文字的情况
Cognition. 1994 Mar;51(3):199-236. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90054-x.
6
On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.关于图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰效应的类别性质。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):125-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03196357.
7
Feature overlap slows lexical selection: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.特征重叠会减缓词汇选择:来自图词干扰范式的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(12):2325-39. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.923922. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
8
Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.单词命名会减慢图片命名的速度,但不影响累积语义干扰。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Apr;195:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.图片-单词干扰任务中的语义干扰位点。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):111-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196474.
10
Re-visiting "semantic facilitation" of word retrieval for people with aphasia: facilitation yes but semantic no.重新审视失语症患者词汇检索的“语义促进”:有促进作用,但并非语义促进。
Cortex. 2006 Aug;42(6):946-62. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70439-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
2
English semantic word-pair norms and a searchable Web portal for experimental stimulus creation.英文语义词对规范和可搜索的实验刺激物创建 Web 门户。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Sep;45(3):746-57. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0284-z.
3
Repetition blindness reveals differences between the representations of manipulable and nonmanipulable objects.重复盲视揭示了可操作性和不可操作性物体的表示之间的差异。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Oct;38(5):1228-41. doi: 10.1037/a0029035. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
4
The representational-hierarchical view of amnesia: translation from animal to human.遗忘症的表象-层级观点:从动物到人类的转化。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(8):2370-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.026. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
5
Calling all codes: interactive effects of semantics, phonology, and orthography produce dissociations in a repetition blindness paradigm.呼叫所有代码:语义、语音和正字法的交互作用在重复盲视范式中产生分离。
Am J Psychol. 2008 Spring;121(1):105-28.
6
PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.PsychoPy——Python语言编写的心理物理学软件。
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
7
Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things.大量生物和非生物的语义特征生成规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Nov;37(4):547-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03192726.
8
The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.南佛罗里达大学自由联想、押韵及单词片段常模。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195588.
9
Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.方向不变性物体识别:来自重复盲视的证据。
Cognition. 2005 Feb;95(1):73-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.006.
10
Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review.语义启动是由于联想强度还是特征重叠?微观分析综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):785-813. doi: 10.3758/bf03196544.