Damian Markus F, Bowers Jeffrey S
University of Bristol, Department of Experimental Psychology, Bristol, England.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):111-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196474.
Picture-word interference studies typically show that semantically related distractor words embedded within a picture slow picture-naming responses, relative to unrelated ones. This semantic interference effect is commonly interpreted as arising from the competition of lexical-semantic (e.g., Schriefers, Meyer, & Levelt, 1990) or lexical-phonological (e.g., Starreveld & La Heij, 1996) codes. The experiment reported here tests a crucial assumption shared by these accounts--namely, that the effect reflects a lexical, rather than a nonverbal, conceptual conflict. Pictures were named while participants attempted to ignore embedded distractors that were in either verbal or pictorial format. The presence of both words and pictures substantially interfered with naming responses, but only words, not pictures, were found to induce semantic interference. These findings support the claim that for semantic interference to arise, both target picture and distractor have to be lexicalized. Consequently, a general conceptual locus of the effect can be excluded, and the claim that semantic interference is based on a lexical conflict is confirmed.
图词干扰研究通常表明,相对于无关干扰词,嵌入图片中的语义相关干扰词会减缓图片命名反应。这种语义干扰效应通常被解释为源于词汇语义(例如,Schriefers、Meyer和Levelt,1990)或词汇语音(例如,Starreveld和La Heij,1996)编码的竞争。本文报告的实验检验了这些解释所共有的一个关键假设——即该效应反映的是词汇冲突,而非非语言概念冲突。在参与者试图忽略以语言或图片形式嵌入的干扰词的同时对图片进行命名。单词和图片的存在都严重干扰了命名反应,但仅发现单词而非图片会引发语义干扰。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即要产生语义干扰,目标图片和干扰词都必须被词汇化。因此,可以排除该效应的一般概念性根源,并且证实了语义干扰基于词汇冲突这一观点。