Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Unit of Epidemiology and biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0211690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211690. eCollection 2019.
The relation between burden of risk factors, familial coronary artery disease (CAD), and known genetic variants underlying CAD and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is not well-explored in clinical samples. We aimed to investigate the association of these measures with age at onset of CAD requiring revascularizations in a clinical sample of patients undergoing first-time coronary angiography.
1599 individuals (mean age 64 years [min-max 29-96 years], 28% women) were genotyped (from blood drawn as part of usual clinical care) in the Copenhagen area (2010-2014). The burden of common genetic variants was measured as aggregated genetic risk scores (GRS) of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) discovered in genome-wide association studies.
Self-reported familial CAD (prevalent in 41% of the sample) was associated with -3.2 years (95% confidence interval -4.5, -2.2, p<0.0001) earlier need of revascularization in sex-adjusted models. Patients with and without familial CAD had similar mean values of CAD-GRS (unweighted scores 68.4 vs. 68.0, p = 0.10, weighted scores 67.7 vs. 67.5, p = 0.49) and LDL-C-GRS (unweighted scores 58.5 vs. 58.3, p = 0.34, weighted scores 63.3 vs. 61.1, p = 0.41). The correlation between the CAD-GRS and LDL-C-GRS was low (r = 0.14, p<0.001). In multivariable adjusted regression models, each 1 standard deviation higher values of LDL-C-GRS and CAD-GRS were associated with -0.70 years (95% confidence interval -1.25, -0.14, p = 0.014) and -0.51 years (-1.07, 0.04, p = 0.07) earlier need for revascularization, respectively.
Young individuals presenting with CAD requiring surgical interventions had a higher genetic burden of SNPs relating to LDL-C and CAD (although the latter was statistically non-significant), compared with older individuals. However, the absolute difference was modest, suggesting that genetic screening can currently not be used as an effective prediction tool of when in life a person will develop CAD. Whether undiscovered genetic variants can still explain a "missing heritability" in early-onset CAD warrants more research.
在临床样本中,风险因素负担、家族性冠状动脉疾病 (CAD)、已知 CAD 遗传变异和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (LDL-C) 水平之间的关系尚未得到充分探索。我们旨在研究这些措施与首次接受冠状动脉造影的患者的 CAD 发病年龄之间的关联。
1599 名个体(平均年龄 64 岁[最小-最大 29-96 岁],28%为女性)在哥本哈根地区(2010-2014 年)进行了基因分型(从血液中提取,作为常规临床护理的一部分)。常见遗传变异的负担通过单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 的聚集遗传风险评分 (GRS) 来衡量,这些 SNP 是在全基因组关联研究中发现的。
自我报告的家族性 CAD(样本中占 41%)与校正性别后的再血管化需求提前 3.2 年(95%置信区间 -4.5,-2.2,p<0.0001)相关。有家族性 CAD 和没有家族性 CAD 的患者的 CAD-GRS(未加权评分 68.4 与 68.0,p = 0.10,加权评分 67.7 与 67.5,p = 0.49)和 LDL-C-GRS(未加权评分 58.5 与 58.3,p = 0.34,加权评分 63.3 与 61.1,p = 0.41)的平均值相似。CAD-GRS 和 LDL-C-GRS 之间的相关性较低(r = 0.14,p<0.001)。在多变量调整的回归模型中,LDL-C-GRS 和 CAD-GRS 的每个 1 个标准差增加与再血管化需求提前 0.70 年(95%置信区间 -1.25,-0.14,p = 0.014)和 0.51 年(-1.07,0.04,p = 0.07)相关。
与年龄较大的个体相比,需要手术干预的年轻 CAD 患者的 LDL-C 和 CAD 相关 SNP 的遗传负担更高(尽管后者在统计学上没有意义)。然而,绝对差异较小,表明遗传筛查目前不能用作预测个体何时会发生 CAD 的有效工具。未发现的遗传变异是否仍能解释早发 CAD 的“缺失遗传率”,值得进一步研究。