Department of Epidemiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department of Epidemiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):682-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv070. Epub 2015 May 6.
To examine the incremental predictive value of genetic risk scores of coronary heart disease (CHD) in the 10-year risk prediction of incident CHD.
In 5899 subjects, we used 152 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with coronary artery disease by the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D consortium to construct three weighted genetic risk scores: (i) GRS(gws) based on 49 genome-wide significant SNPs; (ii) GRS(fdr) based on 103 suggestively associated SNPs; and (iii) GRS(all) based on all 152 SNPs. We examined the changes in discrimination and reclassification of incident CHD when adding the genetic risk scores to models including traditional risk factors. We repeated the analysis for prevalent CHD.
The genetic risk scores were associated with incident CHD despite adjustment for traditional risk factors and family history: participants had a 13% higher rate of CHD per standard deviation increase in GRS(all). GRS(all )improved the C-statistic by 0.006 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000, 0.013] beyond age and sex, 0.003 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.008) beyond traditional risk factors and 0.003 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.007) beyond traditional risk factors and family history. The genetic risk scores did not improve reclassification. GRS(all) strongly improved both discrimination and reclassification of prevalent CHD, even beyond traditional risk factors and family history, with a C-statistic improvement of 0.009 (0.003, 0.015).
Although the genetic risk scores based on 152 SNPs were associated with incident CHD, they did not improve risk prediction. This discrepancy may be the result of SNP discovery for prevalent rather than incident CHD, since the SNPs do improve prediction for prevalent disease.
探讨冠心病(CHD)遗传风险评分在 CHD 事件 10 年风险预测中的增量预测价值。
在 5899 名受试者中,我们使用通过 CARDIoGRAMplusC4D 联盟与冠状动脉疾病相关的 152 个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)构建了三种加权遗传风险评分:(i)基于 49 个全基因组显著 SNP 的 GRS(gws);(ii)基于 103 个提示相关 SNP 的 GRS(fdr);和(iii)基于所有 152 个 SNP 的 GRS(all)。我们研究了当将遗传风险评分添加到包括传统危险因素的模型中时,对 CHD 事件发生的判别和重新分类的变化。我们对现患 CHD 进行了重复分析。
尽管调整了传统危险因素和家族史,遗传风险评分仍与 CHD 事件相关:参与者的 CHD 发生率每增加一个标准差,GRS(all)就增加 13%。GRS(all)在年龄和性别之外提高了 0.006(95%置信区间:0.000,0.013),在传统危险因素之外提高了 0.003(95%置信区间:-0.001,0.008),在传统危险因素和家族史之外提高了 0.003(95%置信区间:-0.001,0.007)。遗传风险评分并未改善重新分类。GRS(all)大大改善了现患 CHD 的判别和重新分类,甚至超过了传统危险因素和家族史,C 统计量提高了 0.009(0.003,0.015)。
尽管基于 152 个 SNP 的遗传风险评分与 CHD 事件相关,但并未改善风险预测。这种差异可能是由于 SNP 的发现是针对现患而非事件性 CHD,因为这些 SNP 确实改善了对现患疾病的预测。