Reed Nicholas S, Oliver Antoinette, Srinivasan Nirmal Kumar, Lin Frank R, Korczak Peggy A
Department of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Semin Hear. 2019 Feb;40(1):26-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676781. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
The Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act of 2017 was signed into law in August 2017 and facilitates the introduction of direct-to-consumer sales of hearing aids for adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Among many questions surrounding over-the-counter sales is the ability of users to self-fit amplification. Many studies have conducted self-fitting procedures using guidance materials provided by audiologists. In this pilot, we explore the ability of users to self-adjust personal sound amplification devices using only materials provided by the manufacturer and contrast this with models that involve a hearing professional. Outcomes to assess adjustments included clinic-based speech-in-noise measures and ability to approximate NAL-NL2 prescriptive targets. We found that an audiologist-driven model provided the best outcomes. However, it is unknown if the difference is clinically meaningful.
2017年的《非处方助听器法案》于2017年8月签署成为法律,该法案为轻度至中度听力损失的成年人引入直接面向消费者销售助听器提供了便利。围绕非处方销售存在诸多问题,其中之一是用户自行适配放大功能的能力。许多研究使用听力学家提供的指导材料进行了自行适配程序。在本次试点中,我们探讨了用户仅使用制造商提供的材料自行调整个人声音放大设备的能力,并将其与有听力专业人员参与的模式进行对比。评估调整情况的结果包括基于诊所的噪声环境下言语测试指标以及接近NAL-NL2规定目标的能力。我们发现,由听力学家主导的模式产生了最佳效果。然而,这种差异在临床上是否有意义尚不清楚。