Rattanachotphanit Thananan, Limwattananon Chulaporn, Waleekhachonloet Onanong
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.
Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Jan 30;10:2042098618820502. doi: 10.1177/2042098618820502. eCollection 2019.
The aim of this study was to assess trends and variations in coprescribing of simvastatin or atorvastatin with interacting drugs in Thailand.
Outpatient prescriptions between 2013 and 2015 in 26 tertiary care hospitals were analyzed for statin coprescribing. The proportion of patients exposed to coprescribing was estimated for semi-annual changes, using a time-series analysis and for hospital variations, using an interquartile range (IQR).
The coprescribing of simvastatin with all contraindicated drugs in 10 university and 16 general hospitals, respectively, was 3.6 and 3.1% in 2013, then decreased to 3.2 and 2.6% in 2014 and to 2.6 and 2.0% in 2015. The drug most frequently coprescribed with simvastatin, on a decreasing trend (by 0.19 percentage points) was gemfibrozil (in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively; 2.9, 2.3 and 2.0% in university hospitals, and 2.5, 2.0 and 1.6% in general hospitals). A similar trend was found in atorvastatin-gemfibrozil coprescribing. Patients coprescribed simvastatin with the rest of the contraindicated drugs were relatively stable at 0.6-0.8%. No protease inhibitors were coprescribed with simvastatin and atorvastatin. The IQR of simvastatin coprescribing in the university hospitals was smaller than that in the general hospitals and decreased over time.
Coprescriptions potentially leading to drug interactions with simvastatin in Thailand were observed although the contraindicated drugs were acknowledged. Mutual awareness among health professionals and the implementation of electronic prescribing should be strengthened as zero drug interaction was possible as in the case of protease inhibitors in the present study.
本研究旨在评估泰国辛伐他汀或阿托伐他汀与相互作用药物联合处方的趋势及差异。
分析了26家三级护理医院2013年至2015年的门诊处方中他汀类药物的联合处方情况。采用时间序列分析估计患者接受联合处方的比例的半年变化情况,采用四分位间距(IQR)估计医院间的差异。
2013年,10所大学医院和16所综合医院中,辛伐他汀与所有禁忌药物的联合处方率分别为3.6%和3.1%,2014年降至3.2%和2.6%,2015年降至2.6%和2.0%。与辛伐他汀联合处方最频繁且呈下降趋势(下降0.19个百分点)的药物是吉非贝齐(2013年、2014年和2015年,大学医院分别为2.9%、2.3%和2.0%,综合医院分别为2.5%、2.0%和1.6%)。阿托伐他汀与吉非贝齐联合处方也呈现类似趋势。辛伐他汀与其他禁忌药物联合处方的患者比例相对稳定在0.6% - 0.8%。未发现辛伐他汀和阿托伐他汀与蛋白酶抑制剂联合处方的情况。大学医院中辛伐他汀联合处方的IQR小于综合医院,且随时间下降。
尽管已知禁忌药物,但在泰国仍观察到可能导致与辛伐他汀发生药物相互作用的联合处方情况。应加强医护人员之间的相互认知并实施电子处方,因为如本研究中蛋白酶抑制剂的情况一样,实现零药物相互作用是可能的。