Suppr超能文献

各收治科室在药物相互作用警报及警报 override 方面的差异。 (注:这里“alert overrides”直译为“警报覆盖”,结合医学语境推测可能是指某种对药物相互作用警报的特殊处理方式,比如取消警报之类,具体含义需结合完整文本确定,这里按字面翻译了。)

Differences among admitting departments in alerts and alert overrides for drug-drug interaction.

作者信息

Ahn Eun Kyoung, Kam Hye Jin, Park Dong Kyun, Jung Eun Young, Lee Youngho, Park Rae Woong

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):390-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.3591. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in the incidence and risk factors of alerts for drug-drug interaction (DDI) and the rate of alert overrides by an admitting department.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using electronic health records of a Korean tertiary teaching hospital including all hospitalized adult patients for 18 months. The main outcome measures included incidence rates of alerts for DDI and their override, hazard ratios (HRs) for DDI alerts, and odds ratios (ORs) for alert overrides by admitting department (emergency department [ED], general ward [GW], and intensive care unit [ICU]) after adjusting for other known risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 102 379 incident admissions, 6060 had alerts for DDI (5.4/person-year). After adjusting for covariates, patients admitted to the ED (HR, 4.02; confidence interval [CI], 3.69-4.38) or ICU (HR, 1.62; CI, 1.29-2.04) showed higher risks for DDI compared with those admitted to the GW. The alert-override rate was significantly higher in the ED (OR 1.68) than in the GW; however, there was no significant difference between GW and ICU. The prevalence of DDI alerts and their override rate were also demonstrated.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of DDI and the alert-override rate differed by admitting department. The ED and ICU were associated with higher risks for alerts on DDI than did the GW after adjusting for other known risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Admitting department was an independent risk factor for alerts and alert overrides. Strategies to reduce alerts and alert overrides should consider the admitting department.

摘要

目的

确定药物相互作用(DDI)警报的发生率和风险因素以及收治科室的警报忽略率之间的差异。

方法

采用韩国一家三级教学医院的电子健康记录进行回顾性队列研究,纳入所有成年住院患者,为期18个月。主要结局指标包括DDI警报的发生率及其忽略情况、校正其他已知风险因素后DDI警报的风险比(HR)以及收治科室(急诊科[ED]、普通病房[GW]和重症监护病房[ICU])警报忽略的比值比(OR)。

结果

在102379例入院患者中,6060例有DDI警报(5.4/人年)。校正协变量后,与入住普通病房的患者相比,入住急诊科(HR,4.02;置信区间[CI],3.69 - 4.38)或重症监护病房(HR,1.62;CI,1.29 - 2.04)的患者发生DDI的风险更高。急诊科的警报忽略率(OR 1.68)显著高于普通病房;然而,普通病房和重症监护病房之间没有显著差异。还展示了DDI警报的患病率及其忽略率。

讨论

DDI的发生率和警报忽略率因收治科室而异。校正其他已知风险因素后,急诊科和重症监护病房发生DDI警报的风险高于普通病房。

结论

收治科室是警报和警报忽略的独立风险因素。减少警报和警报忽略的策略应考虑收治科室。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验