Carden Louise J, Saini Pooja, Seddon Claire, Evans Emma, Taylor Peter James
Single Point of Access, Mersey Care NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, NIHR CLAHRC NWC, University of Liverpool, UK.
Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jun;93(2):292-308. doi: 10.1111/papt.12216. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
Many individuals hold different beliefs about the voices that they hear and have distinct relationships with them, the nature of which may determine the distress experienced. Understanding what factors contribute to these beliefs and relationships and consequently the resulting distress is important. The current research examined whether shame and social deprivation, in a sample of adult voice-hearers, were related to the relationships that individuals had with their voices or the beliefs that they held about them.
The study utilized a cross-sectional, Internet-based design.
Eighty-seven adult voice-hearers from England were recruited to the online survey. Participants completed measures regarding shame, beliefs about voices, and relationships with voices and provided demographic information and postcodes that were used to refer to Index of Multiple Deprivation data.
Social deprivation and shame were not associated. Shame was positively associated with variables describing negative voice-hearing beliefs/relationships but not positive voice-hearing beliefs/relationships. Principal component analysis on the eight voice-hearing variables yielded two components related to positive and negative voice-hearing qualities. A multiple regression conducted on the two components identified that shame was only associated with negative voice-hearing qualities.
The results suggest that therapies that target shame may be helpful when working with negative voice-hearing beliefs and relationships. Future research should utilize experimental or longitudinal designs to examine the direction of the relationship.
The results contribute to the limited research evidence available regarding the relationship between shame and voice-hearing. The results suggest the utility of psychological therapies that focus on shame such as compassion-focused therapy and that conceptualize voices interpersonally such as cognitive analytic therapy. No conclusions can be made regarding causation. The sample size was relatively small, and results cannot be generalized to other areas of the United Kingdom. Future research should utilize experimental and longitudinal designs to examine the impact of shame on voice-hearing experiences and to examine other factors that may predict shame.
许多人对他们听到的声音持有不同的信念,并与这些声音有着独特的关系,其本质可能决定所经历的痛苦。了解哪些因素促成了这些信念和关系以及由此产生的痛苦很重要。当前的研究调查了在成年幻听者样本中,羞耻感和社会剥夺感是否与个体和他们听到的声音之间的关系或他们对这些声音的信念有关。
该研究采用了基于互联网的横断面设计。
招募了87名来自英国的成年幻听者参与在线调查。参与者完成了关于羞耻感、对声音的信念以及与声音的关系的测量,并提供了人口统计学信息和邮政编码,用于参考多重剥夺指数数据。
社会剥夺感和羞耻感没有关联。羞耻感与描述负面幻听信念/关系的变量呈正相关,但与正面幻听信念/关系无关。对八个幻听变量进行主成分分析得出了与正面和负面幻听特质相关的两个成分。对这两个成分进行的多元回归分析表明,羞耻感仅与负面幻听特质相关。
结果表明,针对羞耻感的疗法在处理负面幻听信念和关系时可能会有所帮助。未来的研究应采用实验性或纵向设计来研究这种关系的方向。
这些结果为关于羞耻感与幻听之间关系的有限研究证据做出了贡献。结果表明,专注于羞耻感的心理疗法(如以同情为中心的疗法)以及从人际关系角度对声音进行概念化的疗法(如认知分析疗法)具有实用性。无法得出因果关系的结论。样本量相对较小,结果不能推广到英国的其他地区。未来的研究应采用实验性和纵向设计来研究羞耻感对幻听体验的影响,并研究其他可能预测羞耻感的因素。