Jeannis H, Goldberg M, Seelman K, Schmeler M, Cooper R A
Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Human Engineering Research Laboratories, US Department of Veternans Affairs, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Feb;15(2):225-237. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1559889. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
To provide empirical evidence on learning barriers and facilitators in instructional science and engineering laboratory settings from a national survey on students with physical disabilities (SwD-P). A nationwide self-report survey, the Full Participation Science and Engineering Accessibility (FPSEA), was disseminated online via Qualtrics. Approximately 1200 organizations and universities across the United States were contacted through purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics were primarily used for the analysis of the results. Survey findings reveal that students experience a wide range of limitations to full participation in the laboratory, from entering the laboratory (25%) to being given passive roles (50%). Additionally, while 66% of respondents indicated that instructors were willing to help SwD-P participate in science and engineering (S&E) laboratories, 16.8% were not willing to do so, and 47% SwD-P felt that practices were not in place to provide accommodations. The survey also reveals a range of facilitators such as elevators, ramps, accessible course materials and peer assistance. Most respondents (74%) also indicated that peers were helpful in completing laboratory tasks. This survey provides empirical evidence that was previously voiced through non-empirical information in the literature. Participants cited barriers such as inappropriate accommodations and instructors' negative viewpoints, as well as gaining access to facilities even after the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These findings suggest that while ADA has lessened some barriers to SwD-P, barriers remain in using the laboratory space. The FPSEA survey fills the gap in finding barriers and facilitators to using S&E laboratories from the SwD-P's perspective.Implications for RehabiliationBarriers students with disabilities encounter in science and engineering (S&E) laboratory environments remain unclear.The FPSEA survey fills the gap in finding barriers and facilitators to using S&E laboratories from the SwD-P's perspective.The FPSEA survey allows former and current SwD-P to share their experiences using a postsecondary S&E instructional laboratory.
通过一项针对身体残疾学生(SwD-P)的全国性调查,提供关于教学科学与工程实验室环境中学习障碍和促进因素的实证证据。一项全国性的自我报告调查——“全面参与科学与工程无障碍性调查”(FPSEA)通过Qualtrics在线发布。通过目的抽样联系了美国约1200个组织和大学。描述性统计主要用于分析结果。调查结果显示,学生在充分参与实验室方面面临广泛限制,从进入实验室(25%)到被赋予被动角色(50%)。此外,虽然66%的受访者表示教师愿意帮助身体残疾学生参与科学与工程(S&E)实验室,但16.8%的教师不愿意这样做,47%的身体残疾学生认为没有相应措施来提供便利。调查还揭示了一系列促进因素,如电梯、坡道、无障碍课程材料和同伴协助。大多数受访者(74%)还表示同伴在完成实验室任务方面很有帮助。这项调查提供了实证证据,此前文献中的非实证信息也曾提及这些情况。参与者列举了诸如不适当的便利措施和教师的负面观点等障碍,以及即使在《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)颁布后仍难以进入设施的问题。这些发现表明,虽然《美国残疾人法案》减少了一些身体残疾学生面临的障碍,但在使用实验室空间方面障碍仍然存在。FPSEA调查填补了从身体残疾学生的角度寻找使用科学与工程实验室的障碍和促进因素方面的空白。
康复方面的启示
残疾学生在科学与工程(S&E)实验室环境中遇到的障碍仍不明确。
FPSEA调查填补了从身体残疾学生的角度寻找使用科学与工程实验室的障碍和促进因素方面的空白。
FPSEA调查使以前和现在的身体残疾学生能够分享他们使用高等教育科学与工程教学实验室的经历。