• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院姑息治疗咨询可改善倾向评分匹配队列中基于价值的购买结果。

Hospital palliative care consult improves value-based purchasing outcomes in a propensity score-matched cohort.

机构信息

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.

2 Value Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;33(4):452-456. doi: 10.1177/0269216318824270. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1177/0269216318824270
PMID:30729864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8008250/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital-based palliative care consultation is consistently associated with reduced hospitalization costs and more importantly with improved patient quality of life. As healthcare systems move toward value-based purchasing rather than fee-for-service models, understanding how palliative care consultation is associated with value-based purchasing metrics can provide evidence for expanded health system support for a greater palliative care presence.

AIM

To understand how a palliative care consultation impacts rates of patient readmission and hospital-acquired infections associated with value-based purchasing metrics.

DESIGN

Retrospective propensity-matched case-control study evaluating the impact of palliative care consultation on hospital charges, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, readmission rates, and rates of hospital-acquired conditions.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients admitted to a two hospital healthcare system over a 2-year period from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2017. The palliative care team involved three physicians, five advanced practice providers, a social worker, and a chaplain during the study period.

RESULTS

A total of 3415 patients receiving a palliative consult were propensity matched to 25,028 controls. Compared to controls, cases had decreased charges per day and decreased rates of 7-, 30-, and 90-day readmissions.

CONCLUSION

Through value-based purchasing, hospitals have 3% of their Medicare reimbursements at risk based on readmission rates. By clarifying prognosis and patient goals, palliative care consultation reduces readmission rates. Hospital systems may want to invest in larger palliative care programs as part of their efforts to reduce hospital readmissions.

摘要

背景

基于医院的姑息治疗咨询一直与降低住院费用相关,更重要的是与提高患者生活质量相关。随着医疗保健系统转向基于价值的采购,而不是按服务收费的模式,了解姑息治疗咨询如何与基于价值的采购指标相关,可以为扩大卫生系统对更大程度的姑息治疗支持提供证据。

目的

了解姑息治疗咨询如何影响与基于价值的采购指标相关的患者再入院率和医院获得性感染率。

设计

回顾性倾向评分匹配病例对照研究,评估姑息治疗咨询对医院收费、住院和重症监护病房住院时间、再入院率以及医院获得性疾病发生率的影响。

设置/参与者:在 2015 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间,从两个医院医疗系统中随机抽取的所有成年患者,共 3415 例患者接受姑息治疗咨询,并与 25028 例对照进行倾向评分匹配。在研究期间,姑息治疗团队由 3 名医生、5 名高级执业医师、1 名社会工作者和 1 名牧师组成。

结果

与对照组相比,接受姑息治疗咨询的患者每天的费用降低,7 天、30 天和 90 天的再入院率降低。

结论

通过基于价值的采购,医院有 3%的医疗保险报销面临再入院率的风险。姑息治疗咨询通过明确预后和患者目标降低了再入院率。医院系统可能希望投资更大的姑息治疗项目,作为降低医院再入院率的努力的一部分。

相似文献

1
Hospital palliative care consult improves value-based purchasing outcomes in a propensity score-matched cohort.医院姑息治疗咨询可改善倾向评分匹配队列中基于价值的购买结果。
Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;33(4):452-456. doi: 10.1177/0269216318824270. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
30-Day Readmission Rates in Patients Admitted for Heart Failure Exacerbation with and without Palliative Care Consultation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.伴有和不伴有姑息治疗会诊的因心力衰竭加重入院患者的30天再入院率:一项回顾性队列研究
J Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;20(2):163-169. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0305. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Palliative Care Consultation for Goals of Care and Future Acute Care Costs: A Propensity-Matched Study.针对医疗护理目标和未来急性护理成本的姑息治疗咨询:一项倾向匹配研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;35(7):966-971. doi: 10.1177/1049909117743475. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
4
The Impact of Inpatient Palliative Care Consultations on 30-Day Hospital Readmissions.住院姑息治疗会诊对30天内再次入院的影响。
J Palliat Med. 2015 Nov;18(11):956-61. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0138. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Association of Inpatient Palliative Care with Health Care Utilization and Postdischarge Outcomes among Medicare Beneficiaries with End Stage Kidney Disease.终末期肾病医疗保险受益患者住院姑息治疗与医疗利用及出院后结局的相关性。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Aug 7;13(8):1180-1187. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00180118. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
The value of compassion: Healthcare savings of palliative care consults in trauma.共情的价值:创伤患者接受姑息治疗咨询的医疗保健节省。
Injury. 2023 Jan;54(1):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.10.021. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
7
A hospice-hospital partnership: reducing hospitalization costs and 30-day readmissions among seriously ill adults.临终关怀机构与医院的合作关系:降低重症成年患者的住院费用及30天再入院率
J Palliat Med. 2014 Sep;17(9):1005-10. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0612. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
8
Palliative Care Consultation Reduces Heart Failure Transitions: A Matched Analysis.姑息治疗咨询可减少心力衰竭的转归:一项匹配分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e013989. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013989. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
A Palliative Radiation Oncology Consult Service Reduces Total Costs During Hospitalization.姑息性放射肿瘤学咨询服务可降低住院期间的总费用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jun;55(6):1452-1458. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Cost analysis of a prospective multi-site cohort study of palliative care consultation teams for adults with advanced cancer: Where do cost-savings come from?一项针对晚期癌症成年患者姑息治疗咨询团队的前瞻性多中心队列研究的成本分析:成本节约来自何处?
Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;31(4):378-386. doi: 10.1177/0269216317690098. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
[S1 guideline on sustainability in intensive care and emergency medicine].[重症监护与急诊医学可持续性S1指南]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01261-0.
2
Early palliative care for solid and blood cancer patients and caregivers: Quantitative and qualitative results of a long-term experience as a case of value-based medicine.实体瘤和血液肿瘤患者及照护者的早期姑息治疗:作为基于价值的医学案例的长期经验的定量和定性结果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;11:1092145. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1092145. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of hospice utilization and publicly reported outcomes following hospitalization for pneumonia or heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.住院治疗肺炎或心力衰竭后临终关怀利用情况与公开报告结果的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 9;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2801-3.
2
Funding models in palliative care: Lessons from international experience.姑息治疗的资金模式:国际经验教训
Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;31(4):296-305. doi: 10.1177/0269216316689015. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
What cost components are relevant for economic evaluations of palliative care, and what approaches are used to measure these costs? A systematic review.姑息治疗经济评估的相关成本构成要素有哪些,以及采用何种方法来衡量这些成本?一项系统综述。
Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;31(4):323-337. doi: 10.1177/0269216316670287. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
4
Palliative Care Teams' Cost-Saving Effect Is Larger For Cancer Patients With Higher Numbers Of Comorbidities.姑息治疗团队对合并症数量较多的癌症患者的成本节约效果更大。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):44-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0752.
5
The Business Case for Palliative Care: Translating Research Into Program Development in the U.S.姑息治疗的商业案例:将美国的研究转化为项目开发
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Dec;50(6):741-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
Evidence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of palliative care: a literature review.姑息治疗的成本及成本效益证据:一项文献综述。
Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):130-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216313493466. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
7
Palliative care consultation teams cut hospital costs for Medicaid beneficiaries.姑息治疗咨询团队为医疗补助受益人的医院费用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):454-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0929.
8
PURLs. Palliative care: earlier is better.永久资源定位符。姑息治疗:越早越好。
J Fam Pract. 2010 Dec;59(12):695-8.
9
Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs.美国医院姑息治疗咨询项目相关的成本节约
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 8;168(16):1783-90. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1783.
10
Funding for palliative care programs in developing countries.发展中国家姑息治疗项目的资金支持。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 May;33(5):509-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.003.