Department of Psychology.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Dec;117(6):1083-1104. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000176. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Although victimized groups have a need to recover diminished power, perpetrator groups are often reluctant to support actions that may undermine their own systemic advantages. We hypothesized that perpetrator group members' experience of empathetic collective angst-a group-based emotion focused on concern for the future vitality of an outgroup-mediates the relation between the perception of threat to the future of the victimized group and support for policies that may satisfy the group's empowerment. Across 5 studies and 3 distinct intergroup contexts (victimization of Aboriginal Canadians by non-Aboriginal Canadians, Native Americans by non-Native Americans, and French Canadians by Anglophone Canadians), we showed that perpetrator group members who perceive (Study 1) or are manipulated to perceive (Studies 2-5) that the victimized group is under existential threat (vs. secure) experience greater empathetic collective angst for the victimized group. In no study did perceived existential threat to the victimized group influence collective guilt-a group-based emotion focused on illegitimate harms committed against an outgroup. Empathetic collective angst mediated the relation between perceived existential threat and support for victimized group empowerment (e.g., self-determination). Study 4 found that the relation between empathetic collective angst and support for victimized group empowerment was stronger among perpetrator group members than bystander group members. A synthesis of the findings showed that the indirect effect was statistically significant across studies. Results suggest that, in the aftermath of victimization, empathetic collective angst motivates perpetrator group members to support policies that may satisfy victims' power needs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
虽然受害群体有恢复权力的需要,但加害群体往往不愿意支持可能破坏其自身系统优势的行动。我们假设加害群体成员共情集体焦虑的体验——一种关注外群体未来活力的群体情绪——调解了对受害群体未来的威胁感知与支持可能满足群体赋权的政策之间的关系。在 5 项研究和 3 个不同的群体间情境中(非原住民加拿大人对原住民加拿大人的侵害、非原住民美国人对原住民美国人的侵害以及讲英语的加拿大人对说法语的加拿大人的侵害),我们表明,感知到(研究 1)或被操纵感知到(研究 2-5)受害群体受到生存威胁(而非安全)的加害群体成员对受害群体产生更大的共情集体焦虑。在没有一项研究中,受害群体的生存威胁感知影响了集体内疚——一种关注对外群体实施的非法伤害的群体情绪。共情集体焦虑调解了感知到的生存威胁与支持受害群体赋权(例如,自决)之间的关系。研究 4 发现,在共情集体焦虑与支持受害群体赋权之间的关系中,加害群体成员比旁观者群体成员更强。研究结果的综合表明,间接效应在所有研究中均具有统计学意义。结果表明,在受害之后,共情集体焦虑激励加害群体成员支持可能满足受害者权力需求的政策。(APA 心理档案记录(c)2019,保留所有权利)。