a Psychology Department , The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Jerusalem , Israel.
b Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology , Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) , Herzliya , Israel.
Cogn Emot. 2019 May;33(3):480-491. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1460321. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
A careful look at societies facing threat reveals a unique phenomenon in which liberals and conservatives react emotionally and attitudinally in a similar manner, rallying around the conservative flag. Previous research suggests that this rally effect is the result of liberals shifting in their attitudes and emotional responses toward the conservative end. Whereas theories of motivated social cognition provide a motivation-based account of cognitive processes (i.e. attitude shift), it remains unclear whether emotional shifts are, in fact, also a motivation-based process. Herein, we propose that under threat, liberals are motivated to feel existential concern about their group's future vitality (i.e. collective angst) to the same extent as conservatives, because this group-based emotion elicits support for ingroup protective action. Within the context of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, we tested and found support for this hypothesis both inside (Study 1) and outside (Study 2) the laboratory. We did so using a behavioural index of motivation to experience collective angst. We discuss the implications of our findings for understanding motivated emotion regulation in the context of intergroup threat.
仔细观察面临威胁的社会,会发现一个独特的现象,即自由派和保守派以类似的方式在情感和态度上做出反应,团结在保守派旗帜下。先前的研究表明,这种团结效应是自由派在态度和情感反应上向保守派转变的结果。尽管动机社会认知理论为认知过程(即态度转变)提供了一个基于动机的解释,但情绪转变是否也是一个基于动机的过程仍不清楚。在这里,我们提出,在受到威胁时,自由派会出于对其群体未来活力的生存关注(即集体焦虑)而产生与保守派相同程度的动机,因为这种基于群体的情绪会引发对保护群体行动的支持。在巴以冲突的背景下,我们在实验室内外(研究 1 和研究 2)都进行了测试并支持了这一假设。我们使用体验集体焦虑的动机的行为指标来做到这一点。我们讨论了我们的发现对理解群体威胁背景下的动机情绪调节的意义。