• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机情绪和团结旗帜效应:当面临生存威胁时,自由派会像保守派一样,产生集体焦虑感(collective angst)。

Motivated emotion and the rally around the flag effect: liberals are motivated to feel collective angst (like conservatives) when faced with existential threat.

机构信息

a Psychology Department , The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Jerusalem , Israel.

b Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology , Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) , Herzliya , Israel.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2019 May;33(3):480-491. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1460321. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2018.1460321
PMID:29667484
Abstract

A careful look at societies facing threat reveals a unique phenomenon in which liberals and conservatives react emotionally and attitudinally in a similar manner, rallying around the conservative flag. Previous research suggests that this rally effect is the result of liberals shifting in their attitudes and emotional responses toward the conservative end. Whereas theories of motivated social cognition provide a motivation-based account of cognitive processes (i.e. attitude shift), it remains unclear whether emotional shifts are, in fact, also a motivation-based process. Herein, we propose that under threat, liberals are motivated to feel existential concern about their group's future vitality (i.e. collective angst) to the same extent as conservatives, because this group-based emotion elicits support for ingroup protective action. Within the context of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, we tested and found support for this hypothesis both inside (Study 1) and outside (Study 2) the laboratory. We did so using a behavioural index of motivation to experience collective angst. We discuss the implications of our findings for understanding motivated emotion regulation in the context of intergroup threat.

摘要

仔细观察面临威胁的社会,会发现一个独特的现象,即自由派和保守派以类似的方式在情感和态度上做出反应,团结在保守派旗帜下。先前的研究表明,这种团结效应是自由派在态度和情感反应上向保守派转变的结果。尽管动机社会认知理论为认知过程(即态度转变)提供了一个基于动机的解释,但情绪转变是否也是一个基于动机的过程仍不清楚。在这里,我们提出,在受到威胁时,自由派会出于对其群体未来活力的生存关注(即集体焦虑)而产生与保守派相同程度的动机,因为这种基于群体的情绪会引发对保护群体行动的支持。在巴以冲突的背景下,我们在实验室内外(研究 1 和研究 2)都进行了测试并支持了这一假设。我们使用体验集体焦虑的动机的行为指标来做到这一点。我们讨论了我们的发现对理解群体威胁背景下的动机情绪调节的意义。

相似文献

1
Motivated emotion and the rally around the flag effect: liberals are motivated to feel collective angst (like conservatives) when faced with existential threat.动机情绪和团结旗帜效应:当面临生存威胁时,自由派会像保守派一样,产生集体焦虑感(collective angst)。
Cogn Emot. 2019 May;33(3):480-491. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1460321. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
2
Are Liberals and Conservatives Equally Motivated to Feel Empathy Toward Others?自由派和保守派是否同样有动力对他人产生同理心?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Oct;44(10):1449-1459. doi: 10.1177/0146167218769867. Epub 2018 May 8.
3
Perceiving your group's future to be in jeopardy: extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup.感知到自身群体的未来岌岌可危:灭绝威胁引发了集体焦虑,并渴望增强内群体。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;36(7):898-910. doi: 10.1177/0146167210372505. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
4
Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid! Motivated Intergroup Emotion Regulation.害怕吧,害怕得要命!动机性群际情绪调节。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Nov;46(11):1596-1613. doi: 10.1177/0146167220910833. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Empathetic collective angst predicts perpetrator group members' support for the empowerment of the victimized group.同理心集体焦虑预测加害者群体成员对受害群体赋权的支持。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Dec;117(6):1083-1104. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000176. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
6
Unfreezing cognitions during an intractable conflict: Does an external incentive for negotiating peace and (low levels of) collective angst increase information seeking?在棘手冲突中解冻认知:寻求和平的外部激励措施以及(低程度的)集体焦虑情绪是否会增加信息搜寻行为?
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;55(1):65-87. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12121. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
Gut check: reappraisal of disgust helps explain liberal-conservative differences on issues of purity.内心审视:重新评估厌恶感有助于解释在纯洁问题上自由派和保守派的分歧。
Emotion. 2014 Jun;14(3):513-21. doi: 10.1037/a0033727. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum.自由派和保守派的道德刻板印象:政治光谱上差异的夸大。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050092. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
9
Ideology and prejudice: the role of value conflicts.意识形态与偏见:价值冲突的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Feb 1;24(2):140-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797612447820. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
10
In time, we will simply disappear: Racial demographic shift undermines privileged group members' support for marginalized social groups via collective angst.最终,我们将彻底消失:种族人口结构的转变通过集体焦虑削弱了特权群体成员对边缘化社会群体的支持。
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2022 Apr;25(3):NP1-NP23. doi: 10.1177/13684302211023551. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts.社会交际背景下政治两极分化的认知动机机制。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(10):560-576. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
2
Unexpected events during survey design and trust in the police: a systematic review.调查设计中的意外事件与对警方的信任:一项系统综述
J Exp Criminol. 2022 Jun 15:1-27. doi: 10.1007/s11292-022-09508-y.