Department of Psychology.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jun;31(6):828-832. doi: 10.1037/pas0000707. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Growing awareness of developmental prosopagnosia has resulted in large numbers of people self-referring for prosopagnosia screening. Objective assessment depends heavily on available resources; thus, some researchers use self-ratings of face recognition ability to reduce candidate lists. However, our own metacognitive awareness of our face recognition skills has been much debated, and there is mixed evidence on the reliability of self-report measures. Nevertheless, some behavioral trait questionnaires have proved more useful, although it remains unclear whether these instruments can tap prosopagnosia severity or whether responses are influenced by participant gender (as in other developmental disorders). We investigated these issues in 47 adults with developmental prosopagnosia. No relationship was observed between questionnaire scores and prosopagnosia severity, but males were found to underreport prosopagnosia symptoms relative to females. Thus, we recommend caution in the interpretation of low scores on self-report questionnaires and suggest that separate norms are developed for male and female participants. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
对面部识别障碍的发展有了更多的认识,导致大量的人自行要求进行面部识别障碍筛查。客观评估在很大程度上依赖于现有资源;因此,一些研究人员使用自我评估的人脸识别能力来减少候选名单。然而,我们对面部识别能力的元认知意识一直存在很大争议,而且自我报告测量的可靠性存在混合证据。尽管如此,一些行为特质问卷已经被证明更有用,尽管尚不清楚这些工具是否能够探测到面孔失认症的严重程度,或者反应是否受到参与者性别(如其他发育障碍)的影响。我们在 47 名患有发育性面孔失认症的成年人中调查了这些问题。问卷得分与面孔失认症严重程度之间没有观察到关系,但发现男性相对于女性报告的面孔失认症症状较少。因此,我们建议在解释自我报告问卷的低分时要谨慎,并建议为男性和女性参与者制定单独的规范。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。