• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大手术后 30 天死亡率的术前评估:快速序贯器官衰竭评估的作用:一项回顾性观察研究。

Pre-operative assessment of 30-day mortality risk after major surgery: the role of the quick sequential organ failure assessment: A retrospective observational study.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam (TKO, Y-TJ, S-HD, J-WH), and Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (Y-TJ, S-HD, J-WH).

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;36(9):688-694. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000957.

DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000957
PMID:30730423
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is intended for the assessment of the prognosis and risk of sepsis. It may also help predict the mortality risk of nonseptic patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the relationship between pre-operative qSOFA scores and 30-day mortality after major surgery. It also evaluated the predictive value of qSOFA scores combined with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Single tertiary academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Medical records of patients who underwent major surgery (estimated blood loss >500 ml; surgery time >2 h) between January 2010 and December 2017 were examined.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The qSOFA score was measured within 24 h before surgery, and its association with 30-day mortality was analysed using multivariable logistic regression. A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to investigate the predictive power of the pre-operative qSOFA scores combined with the ASA physical status and with CCI.

RESULTS

A total of 6336 patients were included in the final analysis, and 91 (1.4%) died within 30 days. The multivariable logistic regression analysis including all covariates indicated that 30-day mortality was 2.43-times higher for the score 1 group than for the score 0 group (P = 0.002), and it was 3.54-times higher for the score at least 2 group than for the score 0 group (P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the pre-operative qSOFA, ASA physical status and CCI were 0.69, 0.55 and 0.57, respectively. When the pre-operative qSOFA score was combined with the ASA physical status or CCI, the AUCs were 0.73 and 0.72, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Higher pre-operative qSOFA scores within 24 h of surgery were associated with increased 30-day mortality. Pre-operative qSOFA scores have better predictive value for 30-day mortality when combined with the ASA physical status or CCI.

摘要

背景

快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)用于评估脓毒症的预后和风险。它也可能有助于预测非脓毒症患者的死亡风险。

目的

本研究探讨了术前 qSOFA 评分与大手术后 30 天死亡率之间的关系。还评估了 qSOFA 评分与美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况和 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)相结合的预测价值。

设计

回顾性观察研究。

设置

单一三级学术医院。

患者

检查了 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受大手术(估计出血量>500ml;手术时间>2h)的患者的病历。

主要观察指标

在手术前 24 小时内测量 qSOFA 评分,并使用多变量逻辑回归分析其与 30 天死亡率的关系。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析来研究术前 qSOFA 评分与 ASA 身体状况和 CCI 相结合的预测能力。

结果

共有 6336 名患者纳入最终分析,其中 91 名(1.4%)在 30 天内死亡。包括所有协变量的多变量逻辑回归分析表明,评分 1 组的 30 天死亡率是评分 0 组的 2.43 倍(P=0.002),评分至少 2 组的 30 天死亡率是评分 0 组的 3.54 倍(P<0.001)。术前 qSOFA、ASA 身体状况和 CCI 的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.69、0.55 和 0.57。当将术前 qSOFA 评分与 ASA 身体状况或 CCI 相结合时,AUC 分别为 0.73 和 0.72。

结论

手术前 24 小时内较高的 qSOFA 评分与 30 天死亡率增加相关。术前 qSOFA 评分与 ASA 身体状况或 CCI 相结合时,对 30 天死亡率具有更好的预测价值。

相似文献

1
Pre-operative assessment of 30-day mortality risk after major surgery: the role of the quick sequential organ failure assessment: A retrospective observational study.大手术后 30 天死亡率的术前评估:快速序贯器官衰竭评估的作用:一项回顾性观察研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;36(9):688-694. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000957.
2
[Evaluation value of the quick sequential organ failure assessment score on prognosis of intensive care unit adult patients with infection: a 17-year observation study from the real world].快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对重症监护病房成年感染患者预后的评估价值:一项基于现实世界的17年观察性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):544-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.008.
3
[Diagnosis accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment score for adult sepsis patient with soft tissue infection].[快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对成人软组织感染性脓毒症患者的诊断准确性]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Aug;31(8):933-937. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.08.004.
4
Addition of lactic acid levels improves the accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment in predicting mortality in surgical patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a retrospective study.乳酸水平的加入提高了快速序贯器官衰竭评估在预测合并腹腔内感染的外科患者死亡率方面的准确性:一项回顾性研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Mar 13;13:14. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0173-6. eCollection 2018.
5
Superior performance of National Early Warning Score compared with quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in predicting adverse outcomes: a retrospective observational study of patients in the prehospital setting.国家早期预警评分优于快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分预测不良结局:一项在院前环境中对患者的回顾性观察研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):433-439. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000589.
6
[Clinical value of Oxford acute severity of illness score in identifying quick sequential organ failure assessment-negative patients with sepsis].牛津急性疾病严重程度评分在识别序贯器官衰竭评估阴性的脓毒症患者中的临床价值
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 12;41(9):701-708. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2018.09.010.
7
[A multicenter confirmatory study about precision and practicability of Sepsis-3].关于脓毒症-3(Sepsis-3)精准度与实用性的多中心验证性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):99-105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.002.
8
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者:使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
9
Quick sequential organ failure assessment score combined with other sepsis-related risk factors to predict in-hospital mortality: Post-hoc analysis of prospective multicenter study data.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分结合其他脓毒症相关危险因素预测住院死亡率:前瞻性多中心研究数据的事后分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254343. eCollection 2021.
10
Combining quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment with plasma lactate concentration is comparable to standard Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting mortality of patients with and without suspected infection.将快速序贯器官衰竭评估与血浆乳酸浓度相结合,在预测有或无疑似感染患者的死亡率方面,与标准序贯器官衰竭评估评分相当。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Opioid-Sparing Effects of Intraoperative Esketamine Combined with Dexmedetomidine During Laparoscopic Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial.腹腔镜下腹部大手术中术中美沙酮联合右美托咪定的阿片类药物节省效应:一项随机对照双盲试验
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Mar 14;19:1971-1981. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S480700. eCollection 2025.
2
Identifying Factors Associated With Code Status Changes After Emergency General Surgery.识别急诊普通外科术后患者的临床状况改变相关因素。
J Surg Res. 2024 Feb;294:150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.073. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
Association of Postoperative Undertriage to Hospital Wards With Mortality and Morbidity.
术后分诊不当与医院病房死亡率和发病率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2131669. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31669.
4
Novel Multiparametric Nomogram for Overall Survival Prediction in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection: A Multicenter Study in China.用于复杂腹腔内感染总生存预测的新型多参数列线图:一项中国的多中心研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 22;8:627416. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.627416. eCollection 2021.