Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Children's Health Research Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Department of Neuroscience, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Mar;92:297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
This review aimed to describe social outcomes in adulthood for people with a history of childhood-onset epilepsy and identify factors associated with these outcomes; focused on educational attainment, employment, income/financial status, independence/living arrangement, romantic relationships, parenthood, and friendships.
A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO was conducted, as well as forward and backward citation tracking. A total of 45 articles met inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, and subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes for people with epilepsy (PWE) with good prognosis (e.g., normal intelligence, 'epilepsy-only') and poor prognosis (e.g., intellectual disability, Dravet syndrome), and those who underwent epilepsy surgery in childhood.
Among all PWE, 73% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-82%) completed secondary school education, 63% (95%CI: 56-70%) were employed; 74% (95%CI: 68-81%) did not receive governmental financial assistance; 32% (95%CI: 25-39%) were in romantic relationships; 34% (95%CI: 24-45%) lived independently; 21% (95%CI:12-33%) had children, and 79% (95%CI: 71-87%) had close friend(s). People with epilepsy often fared worse relative to healthy controls. Among PWE with a good prognosis, a comparable number of studies reported similar/better outcomes relative to controls as reported poorer outcomes. The most consistent predictor of poorer outcomes was the presence of cognitive problems; results of studies evaluating seizure control were equivocal.
People with epilepsy with a good prognosis may show similar social outcomes as controls, though robust conclusions are difficult to make given the extant literature. Seizure control does not guarantee better outcomes. There is a need for more studies evaluating prognostic factors and studies with control groups to facilitate appropriate comparisons.
本综述旨在描述儿童期起病的癫痫患者成年后的社会结局,并确定与这些结局相关的因素;重点关注教育程度、就业、收入/财务状况、独立性/生活安排、恋爱关系、为人父母和友谊。
对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 PsycINFO 进行了全面检索,并进行了前瞻性和回溯性引文追踪。共有 45 篇文章符合纳入标准。进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并进行了亚组分析,以评估预后良好(例如,智力正常、“癫痫仅”)和预后较差(例如,智力残疾、Dravet 综合征)的癫痫患者(PWE)以及在儿童期接受癫痫手术的患者的结局。
在所有 PWE 中,73%(95%置信区间[CI]:64-82%)完成了中学教育,63%(95%CI:56-70%)就业;74%(95%CI:68-81%)未获得政府财政援助;32%(95%CI:25-39%)处于恋爱关系中;34%(95%CI:24-45%)独立生活;21%(95%CI:12-33%)有子女,79%(95%CI:71-87%)有亲密朋友。癫痫患者的情况往往比健康对照组差。在预后良好的 PWE 中,与对照组相比,相当数量的研究报告了相似/更好的结果,而报告的结果较差。预后较差的最一致预测因素是认知问题的存在;评估癫痫发作控制的研究结果存在争议。
预后良好的癫痫患者可能表现出与对照组相似的社会结局,但鉴于现有文献,很难得出确凿的结论。癫痫发作控制并不能保证更好的结局。需要更多研究评估预后因素和具有对照组的研究,以促进适当的比较。