Mula Marco, Kaufman Kenneth R
Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's University of London, UK; and the Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA; and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
BJPsych Open. 2020 Jul 13;6(4):e72. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.58.
Epilepsy and mental illness share similar problems in terms of stigma, as a result of centuries of superstition, ignorance and misbeliefs. Stigma leads not only to discrimination and civil and human rights violations but also to poor access to healthcare and non-adherence or decreased adherence to treatment, ultimately increasing morbidity and mortality. Despite continuous efforts in fighting stigma in these conditions, there is very limited knowledge on the phenomenon of double stigma, meaning the impact of having two stigmatised conditions at the same time.
To discuss double stigma in mental health with special reference to epilepsy.
Articles were identified through searches in PubMed up to 31 October 2019 using the search terms 'epilepsy', 'psychiatric disorders', 'stigma' and additional material was identified from the authors' own files and from chosen bibliographies.
Double stigma is gaining attention for other stigmatised medical conditions, such as HIV, however, the literature on epilepsy is almost non-existent and this is quite astonishing given that one in three people with epilepsy have a lifetime diagnosis of a psychiatric condition. Felt (perceived) stigma and psychiatric disorders, particularly depression, create a vicious circle in epilepsy maintaining both, as depression correlates with stigma and vice versa as well as epilepsy and depression serving as bidirectional risk factors. This phenomenon has no geographical and economic boundaries as similar data have been reported for low-income and high-income countries.
Governments and policymakers as well as health services, patients' organisations, families and the general public need to be aware of the phenomenon of double stigma in order to develop campaigns and interventions tailored for these patients.
由于数百年的迷信、无知和错误观念,癫痫和精神疾病在污名化方面存在相似问题。污名化不仅导致歧视以及公民权利和人权侵犯,还导致获得医疗保健的机会不佳以及治疗依从性差或依从性降低,最终增加发病率和死亡率。尽管在消除这些疾病的污名化方面不断努力,但对于双重污名现象,即同时患有两种被污名化疾病的影响,了解非常有限。
特别参照癫痫讨论心理健康中的双重污名。
通过在PubMed中检索截至2019年10月31日的文章,使用检索词“癫痫”、“精神障碍”、“污名”,并从作者自己的文件和选定的参考文献中识别其他材料。
双重污名在其他被污名化的医学疾病(如艾滋病毒)方面正受到关注,然而,关于癫痫的文献几乎不存在,鉴于三分之一的癫痫患者一生都被诊断患有精神疾病,这相当令人惊讶。感知到的(感觉到的)污名和精神障碍,尤其是抑郁症,在癫痫中形成了一个恶性循环,两者相互维持,因为抑郁症与污名相关,反之亦然,而且癫痫和抑郁症互为双向风险因素。这种现象没有地理和经济界限,因为低收入和高收入国家都报告了类似的数据。
政府、政策制定者以及卫生服务机构、患者组织、家庭和公众需要意识到双重污名现象,以便为这些患者开展量身定制的宣传活动和干预措施。